G. A. Agenbag
- Plant Science top 10%
- Soil Science top 5%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Forestry top 5%
- Environmental Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Johan FourieO. T. de VilliersJ. L. PurchasePieter A. SwanepoelJohan LabuschagneJohann StraußChloe MacLarenMarie F. Smith
- Topics
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (21 papers)Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (16 papers)Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaBelgiumChina
In The Last Decade
G. A. Agenbag
59 papers receiving 354 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Plant Science 245
- Soil Science 163
- Agronomy and Crop Science 156
- Forestry 40
- Environmental Chemistry 30
Countries citing papers authored by G. A. Agenbag
This map shows the geographic impact of G. A. Agenbag's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. A. Agenbag with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. A. Agenbag more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. A. Agenbag
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. A. Agenbag. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. A. Agenbag. The network helps show where G. A. Agenbag may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. A. Agenbag
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. A. Agenbag. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. A. Agenbag based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. A. Agenbag. G. A. Agenbag is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Effect of different seed treatments on germination of Cyclopia spp. seeds | 1 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | Growth, inorganic content and essential oil quality of Buchu (Agathosma betulina) found in its natural habitat in the Cederberg Mountains | 2 |
| 7 | The effect of superphosphate on the productivity of mucuna (Mucuna pruriens) on a sandy loam soil in Zimbabwe | 1 |
| 8 | The influence of row width, planting density and cultivars on seedling establishment of no-till spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Western Cape, South Africa | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | The effect of fruit shading and size on muskmelon fruit quality | 5 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About G. A. Agenbag
G. A. Agenbag is a scholar working on Forestry, Agronomy and Crop Science and Soil Science, having authored 61 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (21 papers), Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (16 papers) and Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (163 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (156 citations) and Forestry (40 citations). G. A. Agenbag has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Belgium and China. Frequent co-authors include Johan Fourie, O. T. de Villiers, J. L. Purchase, Pieter A. Swanepoel, Johan Labuschagne, Johann Strauß, Chloe MacLaren, Marie F. Smith, S. C. Lamprecht and P. J. Pieterse. Their work appears in journals such as Field Crops Research, Soil and Tillage Research and Agronomy Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.