Fusao Kawai
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Ei‐ichi MiyachiTakashi KurahashiAkimichi KanekoPeter SterlingMasayuki HoriguchiMahito OhkumaA KanekoHiromitsu Suzuki
- Topics
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (18 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers)Retinal Development and Disorders (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Fusao Kawai
31 papers receiving 608 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 452
- Sensory Systems 284
- Molecular Biology 269
- Nutrition and Dietetics 145
- Biomedical Engineering 84
Countries citing papers authored by Fusao Kawai
This map shows the geographic impact of Fusao Kawai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fusao Kawai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fusao Kawai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fusao Kawai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fusao Kawai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fusao Kawai. The network helps show where Fusao Kawai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fusao Kawai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fusao Kawai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fusao Kawai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fusao Kawai. Fusao Kawai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | Patch Clamp Analysis of Voltage–Gated Na+ Currents in Human Retinal Bipolar Cells | 3 |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 97 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | Bacterial Degradation of Water-insoluble Polymer : Polypropylene Glycol : Micronbial Degradation of Synthetic Polymers(II) : | 20 |
About Fusao Kawai
Fusao Kawai is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (18 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (284 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (452 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (145 citations). Fusao Kawai has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ei‐ichi Miyachi, Takashi Kurahashi, Akimichi Kaneko, Peter Sterling, Masayuki Horiguchi, Mahito Ohkuma, A Kaneko, Hiromitsu Suzuki, K Matsuzaki and Kôichi Ogata. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.