Fuk Loi Lam
About
In The Last Decade
Fuk Loi Lam
11 papers receiving 560 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Organic Chemistry 499
- Inorganic Chemistry 317
- Molecular Biology 102
- Biomedical Engineering 79
- Spectroscopy 18
Countries citing papers authored by Fuk Loi Lam
This map shows the geographic impact of Fuk Loi Lam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fuk Loi Lam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fuk Loi Lam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fuk Loi Lam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fuk Loi Lam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fuk Loi Lam. The network helps show where Fuk Loi Lam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fuk Loi Lam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fuk Loi Lam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fuk Loi Lam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fuk Loi Lam. Fuk Loi Lam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 86 | |
| 2 | 65 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 85 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 120 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 94 | |
| 11 | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.