F.T. Pinho

9.0k citations
200 papers · 7.4k · h-index 50

Impact in

Papers in

F.T. Pinho

198 papers receiving 7.1k citations

Peers

F.T. Pinho
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 4.6k
  • Computational Mechanics 4.4k
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.9k
  • Mechanical Engineering 1.2k
  • Ocean Engineering 441
Replace P.J. Oliveira with:
P.J. Oliveira Portugal
M.A. Alves Portugal
Antony N. Beris United States
Robert J. Poole United Kingdom
I.A. Frigaard Canada
R.P. Chhabra India
John Tsamopoulos Greece
William A. Sirignano United States
Georgios C. Georgiou Cyprus
M. J. Crochet Belgium
F.T. Pinho relative to P.J. Oliveira Portugal P.J. Oliveira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
P.J. Oliveira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F.T. Pinho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.T. Pinho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.T. Pinho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.T. Pinho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.T. Pinho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.T. Pinho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.T. Pinho. The network helps show where F.T. Pinho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F.T. Pinho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F.T. Pinho Line = papers co-authored together F.T. Pinho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 200 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002298
2 2009220
3 2003214
4 2020208
5 1998182
6 1999179
7 1990165
8 2002157
9 2001148
10 2001120
11 2013117
12 2007111
13 2000101
14 200899
15 201097
16 201197
17 201296
18 200594
19 200190
20 200087

About F.T. Pinho

F.T. Pinho is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 200 papers that have together received 7.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (166 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (111 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (65 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (30 papers), Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer (24 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films (20 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (16 papers) and Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (4.6k citations), Computational Mechanics (4.4k citations), Biomedical Engineering (2.9k citations), Mechanical Engineering (1.2k citations) and Ocean Engineering (441 citations). F.T. Pinho has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include P.J. Oliveira, M.A. Alves, A.M. Afonso, Mónica Oliveira, P.M. Coelho, J. M. Nóbrega, D. O. A. Cruz, M. P. Escudier, L. L. Ferrás and Patrícia C. Sousa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, Experiments in Fluids, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics and Physics of Fluids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact