Friedrich Steinle

1.3k total citations
40 papers, 551 citations indexed

About

Friedrich Steinle is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Friedrich Steinle has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 551 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 3 papers in Anthropology and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Friedrich Steinle's work include Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (6 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (3 papers). Friedrich Steinle is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (6 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (3 papers). Friedrich Steinle collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and South Korea. Friedrich Steinle's co-authors include Jutta Schickore, Michael Heidelberger, Uljana Feest, Neil M. Ribe, Richard M. Burian, Giora Hon, Ian Davies, Debi Roberson, Paul Whittle and Angus Gellatly and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Today, Philosophy of Science and History of Science.

In The Last Decade

Friedrich Steinle

36 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Friedrich Steinle Germany 9 308 62 53 48 44 40 551
David Gooding United Kingdom 14 341 1.1× 86 1.4× 59 1.1× 69 1.4× 39 0.9× 55 836
Willem Hackmann United Kingdom 7 272 0.9× 40 0.6× 63 1.2× 41 0.9× 34 0.8× 28 547
Peter Kosso United States 12 237 0.8× 45 0.7× 62 1.2× 87 1.8× 21 0.5× 37 558
Jutta Schickore United States 11 203 0.7× 37 0.6× 79 1.5× 55 1.1× 28 0.6× 43 392
James W. McAllister Netherlands 12 268 0.9× 104 1.7× 62 1.2× 98 2.0× 41 0.9× 40 555
Hans Radder Netherlands 13 184 0.6× 64 1.0× 168 3.2× 52 1.1× 26 0.6× 55 580
Paul Hoyningen‐Huene Germany 14 432 1.4× 52 0.8× 150 2.8× 136 2.8× 64 1.5× 64 822
Werner Callebaut Austria 10 147 0.5× 48 0.8× 112 2.1× 24 0.5× 112 2.5× 32 520
Alan F. Chalmers Australia 13 242 0.8× 18 0.3× 57 1.1× 54 1.1× 13 0.3× 55 593
Ingo Brigandt Canada 13 285 0.9× 69 1.1× 116 2.2× 58 1.2× 190 4.3× 46 638

Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich Steinle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich Steinle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich Steinle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich Steinle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich Steinle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich Steinle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich Steinle. The network helps show where Friedrich Steinle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich Steinle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich Steinle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich Steinle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich Steinle. Friedrich Steinle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Steinle, Friedrich. (2018). Wissen und Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte. 41(4). 425–428. 1 indexed citations
2.
Steinle, Friedrich, et al.. (2015). Colour histories : science, art, and technology in the 17th and 18th centuries. De Gruyter eBooks. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hon, Giora, Jutta Schickore, & Friedrich Steinle. (2009). Mapping Going Amiss. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. 267. 1–7. 1 indexed citations
4.
Schickore, Jutta & Friedrich Steinle. (2006). Revisiting discovery and justification : historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 65 indexed citations
5.
Steinle, Friedrich. (2004). Exploratives Experimentieren. Charles Dufay und die Entdeckung der zwei Elektrizitäten. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 3(6). 47. 2 indexed citations
6.
Steinle, Friedrich. (2004). Review of: Edwards, Matthew R. (ed): Pushing gravity. New perspectives on Le Sage's theory of gravitation. Montreal: Apeiron 2002. The British Journal for the History of Science. 234–235. 2 indexed citations
7.
Steinle, Friedrich. (2003). Review of: Heering, Peter; Rieß, Falk and Christian Sichau (eds.): Im Labor der Physikgeschichte: Zur Untersuchung historischer Experimentalpraxis. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag 2000. Physics in Perspective. 122–123. 6 indexed citations
8.
Steinle, Friedrich. (2003). Der Saft, der Funken sprüht. Review of: Hochadel, Oliver: Öffentliche Wissenschaft. Elektrizität in der deutschen Aufklärung. Göttingen: Wallstein 2003. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 16–16. 5 indexed citations
9.
Steinle, Friedrich. (2002). Challenging established concepts: ampère and exploratory experimentation. Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country). 17(44). 291–316. 5 indexed citations
10.
Roberson, Debi, Ian Davies, Jules Davidoff, et al.. (2002). Theories, Technologies, Instrumentalities of Color:Anthropological and Historiographic Perspectives. University Press of America eBooks. 5 indexed citations
11.
Steinle, Friedrich. (2002). "Das Nächste ans Nächste reihen": Goethe, Newton und das Experiment. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 39(1). 141–172. 2 indexed citations
12.
Steinle, Friedrich. (2000). Essay review of: Rehbock, Theda: Goethe und die 'Rettung der Phänomene' : philosophische Kritik am naturwissenschaftlichen Weltbild am Beispiel der Farbenlehre. Konstanz: Verlag am Hockgraben 1995. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 111–118.
13.
Steinle, Friedrich. (1997). Review of: Blondel, Christine; Dörries, Matthias: Restaging Coulomb : usages, controverses et réplications autours de la balance de torsion. Firenze: Olschki 1994. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 204–206. 1 indexed citations
14.
Steinle, Friedrich. (1997). Review of: Krüger, Lorenz (Ed.): Universalgenie Helmholtz : ein Rückblick nach 100 Jahren. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag 1994. NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin. 125–126. 1 indexed citations
15.
Steinle, Friedrich. (1997). Entering New Fields: Exploratory Uses of Experimentation. Philosophy of Science. 64(S4). S65–S74. 159 indexed citations
16.
Steinle, Friedrich. (1996). Work, finish, publish? : The formation of the second series of Faraday's 'Experimental Researches in Electricity'. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 33. 141–220. 5 indexed citations
17.
Steinle, Friedrich. (1995). The amalgamation of a concept - Laws of nature in the new sciences. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 316–368. 6 indexed citations
18.
Steinle, Friedrich. (1995). Looking for a “Simple Case”: Faraday and Electromagnetic Rotation. History of Science. 33(2). 179–202. 7 indexed citations
19.
Steinle, Friedrich. (1992). Was ist Masse? Newtons Begriff der Materiemenge. 29(1). 94–117. 3 indexed citations
20.
Steinle, Friedrich. (1991). Newtons Entwurf "Über die Gravitation---" : ein Stück Entwicklungsgeschichte seiner Mechanik. Franz Steiner Verlag eBooks. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026