Friedrich Kretschmer
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurology top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tudor C. BadeaAnnie ChangStanley N. CohenWenxin MaWai T. WongXu WangLian ZhaoGilles Laurent
- Topics
- Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers)Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Friedrich Kretschmer
24 papers receiving 795 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Molecular Biology 401
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 235
- Neurology 187
- Ophthalmology 166
- Cognitive Neuroscience 134
Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich Kretschmer
This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich Kretschmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich Kretschmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich Kretschmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich Kretschmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich Kretschmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich Kretschmer. The network helps show where Friedrich Kretschmer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich Kretschmer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich Kretschmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich Kretschmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich Kretschmer. Friedrich Kretschmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | |
| 2 | 40 | |
| 3 | 86 | |
| 4 | Tamoxifen provides structural and functional rescue in murine models of photoreceptor degeneration | 20 |
| 5 | 58 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 49 | |
| 8 | Requirement for Microglia for the Maintenance of Synaptic Function and Integrity in the Mature Retina | 1 |
| 9 | 159 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 68 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Comparative studies of methods of Salmonella enrichment. | 2 |
About Friedrich Kretschmer
Friedrich Kretschmer is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (187 citations), Ophthalmology (166 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (235 citations). Friedrich Kretschmer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tudor C. Badea, Annie Chang, Stanley N. Cohen, Wenxin Ma, Wai T. Wong, Xu Wang, Lian Zhao, Gilles Laurent, Jutta Kretzberg and Jeffrey S. Diamond. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.