Sam Reiter

879 total citations
10 papers, 474 citations indexed

About

Sam Reiter is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Sam Reiter has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 474 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Sam Reiter's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers) and Cephalopods and Marine Biology (4 papers). Sam Reiter is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers) and Cephalopods and Marine Biology (4 papers). Sam Reiter collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Japan and United States. Sam Reiter's co-authors include Gilles Laurent, Hua-Peng Liaw, Janie M. Ondracek, Mark Shein‐Idelson, Friedrich Kretschmer, Mark Stopfer, Lorenz A. Fenk, Hsing-Hsi Li, Tatiana Gallego‐Flores and David Hain and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Sam Reiter

9 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sam Reiter Germany	8	227	191	119	89	43	10	474
Adam J. Calhoun United States	8	147 0.6×	109 0.6×	74 0.6×	61 0.7×	62 1.4×	10	372
Nadine Gravett South Africa	13	228 1.0×	150 0.8×	93 0.8×	152 1.7×	108 2.5×	22	475
Mark Shein‐Idelson Israel	14	369 1.6×	356 1.9×	44 0.4×	74 0.8×	34 0.8×	23	587
Dominic A. Evans United Kingdom	5	291 1.3×	222 1.2×	60 0.5×	65 0.7×	137 3.2×	6	514
А. В. Латанов Russia	9	339 1.5×	141 0.7×	79 0.7×	48 0.5×	46 1.1×	46	599
Hanno Fischer United Kingdom	11	136 0.6×	156 0.8×	65 0.5×	21 0.2×	67 1.6×	11	407
Janie M. Ondracek Germany	5	160 0.7×	117 0.6×	38 0.3×	72 0.8×	29 0.7×	9	279
Ruben Vale United Kingdom	8	384 1.7×	303 1.6×	49 0.4×	76 0.9×	143 3.3×	11	719
Brian K. Shaw United States	11	341 1.5×	186 1.0×	122 1.0×	34 0.4×	173 4.0×	12	590
Celia Beron United States	7	187 0.8×	282 1.5×	52 0.4×	56 0.6×	31 0.7×	7	504

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Reiter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Reiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Reiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Reiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Reiter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Reiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Reiter. The network helps show where Sam Reiter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Reiter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Reiter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Reiter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Reiter. Sam Reiter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Mizumoto, Nobuaki & Sam Reiter. (2025). Maintaining tandem movement cohesion through antennal movements in termites. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 22(232). 20250487–20250487.

2.

Shimizu, Kazumichi, Tomoyuki Mano, Teresa L. Iglesias, et al.. (2023). Wake-like skin patterning and neural activity during octopus sleep. Nature. 619(7968). 129–134. 24 indexed citations

3.

Liang, Xitong, Dominic A. Evans, Olivier Fernández, et al.. (2023). The dynamics of pattern matching in camouflaging cuttlefish. Nature. 619(7968). 122–128. 31 indexed citations

4.

Zhou, Zhiwen, et al.. (2023). Circadian control of sleep-related neuronal activity in lizards. PNAS Nexus. 3(1). pgad481–pgad481. 2 indexed citations

5.

Norimoto, Hiroaki, Lorenz A. Fenk, Hsing-Hsi Li, et al.. (2020). A claustrum in reptiles and its role in slow-wave sleep. Nature. 578(7795). 413–418. 103 indexed citations

6.

Reiter, Sam & Gilles Laurent. (2019). Visual perception and cuttlefish camouflage. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 60. 47–54. 21 indexed citations

7.

Reiter, Sam, Marcel A. Lauterbach, Jessica Eberle, et al.. (2018). Elucidating the control and development of skin patterning in cuttlefish. Nature. 562(7727). 361–366. 86 indexed citations

8.

Reiter, Sam, Hua-Peng Liaw, Tracy Yamawaki, Robert K. Naumann, & Gilles Laurent. (2017). On the Value of Reptilian Brains to Map the Evolution of the Hippocampal Formation. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 90(1). 41–52. 23 indexed citations

9.

Shein‐Idelson, Mark, Janie M. Ondracek, Hua-Peng Liaw, Sam Reiter, & Gilles Laurent. (2016). Slow waves, sharp waves, ripples, and REM in sleeping dragons. Science. 352(6285). 590–595. 146 indexed citations

10.

Reiter, Sam, et al.. (2015). Spatiotemporal Coding of Individual Chemicals by the Gustatory System. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(35). 12309–12321. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact