Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges
19961.7k citationsM. J. N. Priestley, Frieder Seible et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Frieder Seible
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frieder Seible's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frieder Seible with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frieder Seible more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frieder Seible. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frieder Seible. The network helps show where Frieder Seible may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frieder Seible
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frieder Seible.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frieder Seible based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frieder Seible. Frieder Seible is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Seible, Frieder, et al.. (1996). Evaluation of Bridge Strengthening Measures Using Forced Vibration Tests. 845–852.3 indexed citations
11.
Seible, Frieder. (1996). ADVANCED COMPOSITES MATERIALS FOR BRIDGES IN THE 21ST CENTURY.16 indexed citations
12.
Karbhari, Vistasp M., Frieder Seible, & G. A. Hegemier. (1996). On the Use of Fiber Reinforced Composites for Infrastructure Renewal— A Systems Approach. 1091–1100.4 indexed citations
13.
Priestley, M. J. N., Frieder Seible, & Gian Michele Calvi. (1996). Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges.1679 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Seible, Frieder & Vistasp M. Karbhari. (1996). Advanced Composites Build on Success. Civil engineering. 66(8). 44–47.8 indexed citations
15.
Priestley, M. J. N., et al.. (1996). SEISMIC ASSESSMENT AND RETROFIT OF BRIDGE COLUMN FOOTINGS. DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE. ACI Structural Journal. 93(6).2 indexed citations
16.
Seible, Frieder, et al.. (1993). Three-Dimensional Analysis Model for Complete Masonry Buildings. 1185–1190.2 indexed citations
17.
Priestley, M. J. N., Frieder Seible, & Donald L. Anderson. (1993). PROOF TEST OF A RETROFIT CONCEPT FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO DOUBLE-DECK VIADUCTS... ACI Structural Journal.2 indexed citations
Chai, Y. H., M. J. N. Priestley, & Frieder Seible. (1991). SEISMIC RETROFIT OF BRIDGE COLUMNS BY STEEL JACKETING. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 95–103.1 indexed citations
20.
Seible, Frieder. (1985). COUPLING JOINTS OF PRESTRESSING TENDONS IN CONTINUOUS POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE BRIDGES. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.