Frederik Van de Steen
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Neurology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Frank Van OverwalleDaniele MarinazzoPeter MariënHannes AlmgrenKarl FristonAdeel RaziKim van DunElien Heleven
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers)Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeuroImageBrain Research
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomItaly
In The Last Decade
Frederik Van de Steen
19 papers receiving 416 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Cognitive Neuroscience 314
- Social Psychology 79
- Neurology 78
- Psychiatry and Mental health 74
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 68
Countries citing papers authored by Frederik Van de Steen
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederik Van de Steen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederik Van de Steen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederik Van de Steen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederik Van de Steen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederik Van de Steen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederik Van de Steen. The network helps show where Frederik Van de Steen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederik Van de Steen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederik Van de Steen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederik Van de Steen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederik Van de Steen. Frederik Van de Steen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 75 | |
| 19 | 30 |
About Frederik Van de Steen
Frederik Van de Steen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (314 citations), Neurology (78 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (74 citations). Frederik Van de Steen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Frank Van Overwalle, Daniele Marinazzo, Peter Mariën, Hannes Almgren, Karl Friston, Adeel Razi, Kim van Dun, Elien Heleven, Simone Kühn and Laura Astolfi. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, NeuroImage and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.