Athéna Demertzi
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 0.5%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Emergency Medicine top 0.2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Co-authors
- Steven LaureysAudrey VanhaudenhuyseAndrea SodduMarie‐Aurélie BrunoOlivia GosseriesMélanie BolyDidier LedouxCaroline Schnakers
- Topics
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research (52 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (45 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Athéna Demertzi
112 papers receiving 6.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.4k
- Epidemiology 2.9k
- Neurology 1.5k
- Emergency Medicine 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Athéna Demertzi
This map shows the geographic impact of Athéna Demertzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Athéna Demertzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Athéna Demertzi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Athéna Demertzi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Athéna Demertzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Athéna Demertzi. The network helps show where Athéna Demertzi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Athéna Demertzi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Athéna Demertzi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Athéna Demertzi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Athéna Demertzi. Athéna Demertzi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordinationbreakdown → | 284 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | Dynamic inter-regional coordination patterns as specific predictors of consciousness | 1 |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | Pain and Nociception in Disorders of Consciousness | 2 |
| 12 | 144 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 154 | |
| 15 | 101 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 144 | |
| 18 | 114 | |
| 19 | The Nociception Coma Scale to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness | 1 |
| 20 | 66 |
About Athéna Demertzi
Athéna Demertzi is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Emergency Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 113 papers that have together received 6.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (52 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (45 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (3.4k citations), Emergency Medicine (1.4k citations) and Neurology (1.5k citations). Athéna Demertzi has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Steven Laureys, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Andrea Soddu, Marie‐Aurélie Bruno, Olivia Gosseries, Mélanie Boly, Didier Ledoux, Caroline Schnakers, Vanessa Charland‐Verville and Quentin Noirhomme. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.