Frederick W. Preston

812 total citations
41 papers, 534 citations indexed

About

Frederick W. Preston is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick W. Preston has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 534 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Oncology and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Frederick W. Preston's work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (3 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers). Frederick W. Preston is often cited by papers focused on Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (3 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers). Frederick W. Preston collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frederick W. Preston's co-authors include Ronald W. Smith, Robert Schrèk, Bo J. Bernhard, Robert E. Hunter, Charles E. Thompson, Otto H. Trippel, Jennifer Reid Keene, Anne Daly, Anita MacDonald and Barry J. Anson and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Frederick W. Preston

37 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Frederick W. Preston
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Surgery 139
  • Neurology 91
  • Clinical Psychology 81
  • Epidemiology 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 60
Replace James T. Lowman with:
James T. Lowman United States
R. Snyder Australia
Robert C. Trueworthy United States
Rebecca J. Lasek United States
Jack Schneider United States
Manveen Kaur Jawanda India
Hazel Κ. Bell United Kingdom
Alastair Munro United Kingdom
J M Howat United Kingdom
Maria C. Bishop United States
James T. Lowman United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Frederick W. Preston
Frederick W. Preston · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Frederick W. Preston
Frederick W. Preston · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Preston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Preston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Preston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Preston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Preston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Preston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Preston. The network helps show where Frederick W. Preston may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick W. Preston

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick W. Preston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick W. Preston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick W. Preston. Frederick W. Preston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 11
2 10
3 3
4 11
5 5
6 26
7 3
8 14
9 1
10 3
11 16
12
Classification and calibration of the azygos venous system in 100 specimens
13
13 0
14 2
15 5
16 13
17 16
18 21
19 22
20 108

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026