Frederick W. George

1.2k citations
49 papers · 897 indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick W. George

49 papers receiving 802 citations

Peers

Frederick W. George
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Otorhinolaryngology 105
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 399
  • Radiation 92
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 53
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 153
Replace T. Kinsella with:
T. Kinsella United States
Richard Terrill United States
D. González González Netherlands
Gijs H. KleinJan Netherlands
Milan Vošmik Czechia
Homayoon Shidnia United States
Henry P. Plenk United States
Barış Karakullukçu Netherlands
M. Lederman United Kingdom
G.C.W. Howard United Kingdom
Frederick W. George relative to T. Kinsella United States T. Kinsella's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
T. Kinsella · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. George

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. George's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. George with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. George more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. George

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. George. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. George. The network helps show where Frederick W. George may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. George, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick W. George Line = papers co-authored together Frederick W. George links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199538
2 199013
3 19891
4 19852
5 19822
6
Modern interstitial and intracavitary radiation management
198110
7 198021
8 19791
9 19781
10 197734
11 19773
12 197628
13 19736
14 197361
15 197347
16 19714
17 19705
18 196727
19 19668
20 196573

About Frederick W. George

Frederick W. George is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Structural Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radiation and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 49 papers that have together received 897 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (3 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (3 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (105 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (399 citations), Radiation (92 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (53 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (153 citations). Frederick W. George has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Samuel S. Kurohara, A.M. Nisar Syed, Lawrence J. Fogel, Bernard H. Feder, Nicola Green, James R. Dillon, C. Eugene Carlton, Nathan Green, David Neblett and James A. Lipsett. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Radiology, Cancer, The Journal of Urology and American Journal of Roentgenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026