Frederick S. Stover

790 citations
33 papers · 675 indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick S. Stover

33 papers receiving 620 citations

Peers

Frederick S. Stover
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Bioengineering 186
  • Electrochemistry 155
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 122
  • Statistics and Probability 82
  • Filtration and Separation 16
Replace Paolo Conti with:
Paolo Conti Italy
Pavan K. Shukla United States
Dom A. J. Swinkels Australia
George. Lauer United States
M.D. Fernández-Ramos Spain
Costandy S. Saba United States
David Acevedo United States
Mingyan Wang China
Glimaldo Marino Brazil
Helena M.N.T. Avelino Portugal
Frederick S. Stover relative to Paolo Conti Italy Paolo Conti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24.4×
Paolo Conti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick S. Stover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick S. Stover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick S. Stover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick S. Stover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick S. Stover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick S. Stover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick S. Stover. The network helps show where Frederick S. Stover may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Frederick S. Stover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick S. Stover Line = papers co-authored together Frederick S. Stover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200217
2 200134
3 199547
4 199016
5 19895
6 198941
7 19895
8 19895
9 19893
10 19887
11 19867
12 19852
13 19824
14 198119
15 197913
16 197813
17 197830
18 197814
19 197719
20 197618

About Frederick S. Stover

Frederick S. Stover is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Electrochemistry, Filtration and Separation, Biomedical Engineering and Spectroscopy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 675 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (12 papers), Fuel Cells and Related Materials (9 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (7 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers) and Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (186 citations), Electrochemistry (155 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (122 citations), Statistics and Probability (82 citations) and Filtration and Separation (16 citations). Frederick S. Stover has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Buck, Robert V Brill, D. C. Silverman, Barry L. Haymore, Ezzeldin Metwalli, Richard K. Brow, Janice K. Gard, Timothy R. Brumleve, Walter Grote and Owen R. Melroy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Analytica Chimica Acta, Electrophoresis, Journal of Membrane Science and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026