Frederick S. Boas

845 total citations
15 papers, 25 citations indexed

About

Frederick S. Boas is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Music and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick S. Boas has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 25 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 1 paper in Music and 1 paper in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Frederick S. Boas's work include Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (1 paper), Religious Education and Schools (1 paper) and Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (1 paper). Frederick S. Boas is often cited by papers focused on Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities (1 paper), Religious Education and Schools (1 paper) and Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (1 paper). Frederick S. Boas collaborates with scholars based in United States. Frederick S. Boas's co-authors include Allardyce Nicoll and Arthur H. Scouten and has published in prestigious journals such as The Modern Language Review, Shakespeare Quarterly and English Journal of the English Association.

In The Last Decade

Frederick S. Boas

8 papers receiving 13 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Frederick S. Boas United States	4	8	6	5	4	3	15	25
Donald Goddard Wing	2	11 1.4×	6 1.0×	4 0.8×	6 1.5×	3 1.0×	3	37
Edwin H. Zeydel United States	3	3 0.4×	6 1.0×	6 1.2×	3 0.8×	3 1.0×	19	26
Joseph T. Shipley United States	5	10 1.3×	10 1.7×	2 0.4×	8 2.0×	1 0.3×	11	38
Friedrich Sengle Germany	3	11 1.4×	3 0.5×		5 1.3×	3 1.0×	24	29
Lin Yutang United States	3	4 0.5×	11 1.8×	4 0.8×	12 3.0×	1 0.3×	9	31
Charles Grivel France	4	12 1.5×	8 1.3×	4 0.8×	3 0.8×	1 0.3×	23	38
Quintilian	5	13 1.6×	8 1.3×		7 1.8×	5 1.7×	12	36
John Lyly	4	11 1.4×	2 0.3×	2 0.4×	4 1.0×	1 0.3×	8	24
Gaston Paris	3	6 0.8×	10 1.7×	1 0.2×	3 0.8×	9 3.0×	12	22
B. A. Botkin	4	8 1.0×	3 0.5×	1 0.2×	8 2.0×		14	32

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick S. Boas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick S. Boas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick S. Boas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick S. Boas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick S. Boas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick S. Boas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick S. Boas. The network helps show where Frederick S. Boas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick S. Boas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick S. Boas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick S. Boas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick S. Boas. Frederick S. Boas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Boas, Frederick S.. (2020). The taming of a shrew: being the original of Shakespeare's Taming of the shrew. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 1 indexed citations

2.

Boas, Frederick S., et al.. (2019). Bussy D'Ambois and The Revenge of Bussy D'Ambois. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

3.

Boas, Frederick S.. (2018). Wordsworth's Patriotic Poems and Their Significance to-Day. Medical Entomology and Zoology.

4.

Boas, Frederick S.. (2011). The Christmas Prince. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

5.

Boas, Frederick S., et al.. (2007). Giles and Phineas Fletcher. Poetical works. Medical Entomology and Zoology.

6.

Boas, Frederick S.. (1968). Shakspere and his predecessors. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 6 indexed citations

7.

Boas, Frederick S.. (1957). Independent Education: In Defence of the Public Schools. English Journal of the English Association. 11(66). 235–236.

8.

Boas, Frederick S., et al.. (1957). The Year's Work in English Studies.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 8(1). 124–124. 1 indexed citations

9.

Boas, Frederick S.. (1957). Shakespeare's Sources. English Journal of the English Association. 11(65). 189–189.

10.

Boas, Frederick S.. (1954). Two Worlds for Memory. English Journal of the English Association. 10(55). 22–23. 1 indexed citations

11.

Scouten, Arthur H., et al.. (1954). The Thespian Mirror: Shakespeare in the Eighteenth-Century Novel.. Modern Language Notes. 69(7). 524–524. 1 indexed citations

12.

Nicoll, Allardyce & Frederick S. Boas. (1954). An Introduction to Eighteenth-Century Drama 1700-1780. The Modern Language Review. 49(1). 70–70. 5 indexed citations

13.

Boas, Frederick S., et al.. (1952). Queen Elizabeth in Drama, and Related Studies.. Shakespeare Quarterly. 3(2). 131–131. 1 indexed citations

14.

Boas, Frederick S.. (1952). English Studies Today. English Journal of the English Association. 9(50). 69–70. 6 indexed citations

15.

Boas, Frederick S.. (1951). Joan of Arc in Shakespeare, Schiller, and Shaw. Shakespeare Quarterly. 2(1). 35–35. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact