Frederick L. Whitam
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robin M. MathyBarry D. AdamJames I. MartinMilton DiamondSune InnalaKenneth PrewittJoseph Harry
- Topics
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (12 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (6 papers)African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (3 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Sociological ReviewArchives of Sexual Behavior
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenGuatemala
In The Last Decade
Frederick L. Whitam
20 papers receiving 553 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Social Psychology 368
- Gender Studies 242
- Sociology and Political Science 200
- Clinical Psychology 164
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 121
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick L. Whitam
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick L. Whitam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick L. Whitam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick L. Whitam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick L. Whitam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick L. Whitam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick L. Whitam. The network helps show where Frederick L. Whitam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick L. Whitam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick L. Whitam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick L. Whitam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick L. Whitam. Frederick L. Whitam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 83 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 92 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 68 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Frederick L. Whitam
Frederick L. Whitam is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Music and Gender Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (12 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (6 papers) and African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (242 citations), Social Psychology (368 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (121 citations). Frederick L. Whitam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include Robin M. Mathy, Barry D. Adam, James I. Martin, Milton Diamond, Sune Innala, Kenneth Prewitt and Joseph Harry. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.