Frederick J. King

30 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Frederick J. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Animal Science and Zoology 101
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 151
  • Biophysics 31
  • Aquatic Science 30
  • Molecular Biology 285
Replace Olga V. Tikhonova with:
Olga V. Tikhonova Russia
Hiroyuki Hanzawa Japan
Kim Oikawa Canada
Valentina Cappelletti Switzerland
Dezső Módos United Kingdom
Susan E. Abbatiello United States
Uma Mudunuri United States
Sandra L. Nelson United States
Andrea Gunawan United States
R Chin United States
Frederick J. King relative to Olga V. Tikhonova Russia Olga V. Tikhonova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.2×
Olga V. Tikhonova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick J. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick J. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick J. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick J. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick J. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick J. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick J. King. The network helps show where Frederick J. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick J. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick J. King Line = papers co-authored together Frederick J. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015104
2 201667
3 199937
4 196236
5 202434
6 200728
7 201128
8 200627
9 196625
10 197523
11 196320
12 201218
13 201114
14 200914
15
STUDY OF IRRADIATED-PASTEURIZED FISHERY PRODUCTS.
19719
16 19688
17
Molecular cloning and sequencing of the murine c-fgr gene.
19908
18 19685
19 20105
20 20063

About Frederick J. King

Frederick J. King is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Animal Science and Zoology, Cell Biology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (9 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (3 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (101 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (151 citations), Biophysics (31 citations), Aquatic Science (30 citations) and Molecular Biology (285 citations). Frederick J. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Lavinia Anderson, Yingyao Zhou, Bin Zhou, S. Frank Yan, Loren Miraglia, Christian N. Parker, Robert Damoiseaux, Eugen Lounkine, Meir Glick and John W. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal of Food Science, Communications Biology, Molecular and Cellular Biology and SLAS DISCOVERY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact