Frederick Gregory
Impact in
- General Psychology top 10%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
- History of Science and Natural History
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 5
- History of Science and Natural History 4
- History of Science and Medicine 3
- Philosophy, Science, and History 3
- Co-authors
- P. Heimann (1 shared paper)Anne Harrington (1 shared paper)Arthur P. Molella (1 shared paper)Thomas Albert Howard (1 shared paper)Sarah E Lamb (1 shared paper)Nick Yeung (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Isis (5 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Modern Intellectual History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Frederick Gregory
16 papers receiving 205 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- General Psychology 22
- History and Philosophy of Science 73
- Philosophy 61
- Theoretical Computer Science 3
- Cognitive Neuroscience 41
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Gregory
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Gregory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Gregory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Gregory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Gregory
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Gregory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Gregory. The network helps show where Frederick Gregory may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Gregory, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1977 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 9 | Knowledge, belief, and aesthetic sense | 1989 | 5 |
| 10 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1983 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 0 |
About Frederick Gregory
Frederick Gregory is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology, Anthropology, Surgery and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), History of Science and Natural History (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (1 paper) and Religion, Theology, and Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (22 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations), Philosophy (61 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (41 citations). Frederick Gregory has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include P. Heimann, Anne Harrington, Arthur P. Molella, Thomas Albert Howard, Sarah E Lamb and Nick Yeung. Their work appears in journals such as Isis, The American Historical Review, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, The Philosophical Quarterly and Modern Intellectual History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.