Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Garber
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Garber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Garber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Garber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Garber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Garber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Garber. The network helps show where Frederick Garber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Garber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Garber.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Garber based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Garber. Frederick Garber is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zelnio, Edmund G. & Frederick Garber. (2004). Algorithms for synthetic aperture radar imagery XI : 12-15 April 2004, Orlando, Florida, USA. SPIE eBooks.1 indexed citations
Garber, Frederick. (1995). Repositionings: Readings of Contemporary Poetry, Photography, and Performance Art. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
Jouny, Ismail, E.K. Walton, Randolph L. Moses, & Frederick Garber. (1990). Bispectral Analysis of Radar Signals with Application to Target Classification. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network). 91. 30356.1 indexed citations
8.
Chamberlain, Neil F., E.K. Walton, A. Ksienski, & Frederick Garber. (1989). Radar Target Identification of Aircraft Using Time-Domain Polarimetric Signatures. 166.2 indexed citations
Ahalt, Stanley C., Frederick Garber, Ismail Jouny, & Ashok Krishnamurthy. (1988). Performance of Synthetic Neural Network Classification of Noisy Radar Signals. Neural Information Processing Systems. 1. 281–288.14 indexed citations
11.
Garber, Frederick, et al.. (1987). Feature Selection Applied to Radar Target Identification.. STIN. 88. 10215.1 indexed citations
12.
Walton, E.K., et al.. (1987). Radar Target Identification Techniques Applied to a Polarization Diverse Aircraft Data Base.. STIN. 87. 24599.3 indexed citations
13.
Garber, Frederick, et al.. (1987). Analysis of the Performance of a Parametric and Nonparametric Classification System: An Application to Feature Selection and Extraction in Radar Target Identification.. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network). 87. 28799.1 indexed citations
14.
Garber, Frederick, et al.. (1987). Syntactic Pattern Recognition for Radar Target Identification..
15.
Kamis, Arnold, Frederick Garber, & Eric J. Walton. (1985). Radar Target Classification Studies - Software Development and Documentation.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 86. 26510.5 indexed citations
Garber, Frederick. (1983). Performance of Digital Communications over Selective Fading Channels.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).2 indexed citations
18.
Garber, Frederick & M.B. Pursley. (1981). Effects of time-selective fading on slow-frequency-hopped DPSK spread-spectrum communications. 4.1 indexed citations
19.
Pursley, M.B., Frederick Garber, & J.S. Lehnert. (1980). Analysis of generalized quadriphase spread-spectrum communications. International Conference on Communications. 1.31 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.