Frédéric Ehrler

74 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

Frédéric Ehrler
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Health Information Management 71
  • Applied Psychology 77
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 15
  • Emergency Medicine 106
  • Health Informatics 12
Replace Mustafa Ozkaynak with:
Mustafa Ozkaynak United States
Connie Chan United States
Mahmood Tara Iran
Marjan Ghazisaeedi Iran
Mollie Cummins United States
Ari H. Pollack United States
Naonori Kodate Ireland
Karen H. Frith United States
Polun Chang Taiwan
Siyu Qian Australia
Frédéric Ehrler relative to Mustafa Ozkaynak United States Mustafa Ozkaynak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Mustafa Ozkaynak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Ehrler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Ehrler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Ehrler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Ehrler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Ehrler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Ehrler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Ehrler. The network helps show where Frédéric Ehrler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Ehrler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Ehrler Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Ehrler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201751
2 201948
3 201731
4 201931
5 201630
6 201826
7 200526
8
Report on the TREC 2005 Experiment: Genomics Track.
200425
9 201825
10 201420
11
Vocabulary-Driven Passage Retrieval for Question-Answering in Genomics.
200718
12 201315
13 201913
14 202013
15 200812
16 201511
17 202011
18 202010
19 202110
20 20219

About Frédéric Ehrler

Frédéric Ehrler is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine and Family Practice, having authored 80 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (32 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (16 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (12 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (9 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (7 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (7 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (7 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (71 citations), Applied Psychology (77 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 citations), Emergency Medicine (106 citations) and Health Informatics (12 citations). Frédéric Ehrler has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Christian Lovis, Johan N Siebert, Katherine Blondon, Patrick Ruch, Milo A. Puhan, Margot Mütsch, Sergio Manzano, Vasileios Nittas, Alain Gervaix and Laurence Lacroix. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, BMC Bioinformatics, Trials and International Journal of Medical Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026