Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Arriving at the high-growth firm
2003979 citationsFrédéric Delmar, Per Davidsson et al.profile →
Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures?
2003625 citationsFrédéric Delmar, Scott Shaneprofile →
Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs
2000616 citationsFrédéric Delmar, Per Davidssonprofile →
Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures
2003586 citationsFrédéric Delmar, Scott Shaneprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Delmar
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Delmar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Delmar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Delmar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Delmar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Delmar. The network helps show where Frédéric Delmar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frédéric Delmar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frédéric Delmar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frédéric Delmar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frédéric Delmar. Frédéric Delmar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Delmar, Frédéric, et al.. (2012). Founder Status, Defensive Mechanisms and IPO Underpricing. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 32(5). 1.6 indexed citations
2.
Lassas-Clerc, Narjisse, Frédéric Delmar, & Alain Fayolle. (2008). ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION INITIATIVES: DOES ACTIVE LEARNING REALLY MAKE DIFFERENCE? (SUMMARY). Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 28(6). 11.2 indexed citations
3.
Delmar, Frédéric, Timothy B. Folta, & Karl Wennberg. (2007). The Dynamics of Combining Self-Employment and Employment. Econstor (Econstor).2 indexed citations
4.
Delmar, Frédéric & Karl Wennberg. (2007). Risk Taking, Aspiration Levels and the Evolution of New Ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
5.
Wetter, Erik & Frédéric Delmar. (2007). PATTERNS OF PERFORMANCE IN NEW FIRMS: THE RELATIVE EFFECTS OF POTENTIAL AND REALIZED ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY. SSRN Electronic Journal. 27(13). 6.3 indexed citations
6.
Wennberg, Karl, Timothy B. Folta, & Frédéric Delmar. (2006). A REAL OPTIONS MODEL OF STEPWISE ENTRY INTO SELF-EMPLOYMENT. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 26(6). 3.10 indexed citations
7.
Davidsson, Per, Frédéric Delmar, & Johan Wiklund. (2006). Entrepreneurship and the Growth of Firms. Books.21 indexed citations
8.
Delmar, Frédéric, Jon Eckhardt, & Scott Shane. (2006). Multistage Selection and the Financing of New Ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal.23 indexed citations
9.
Shane, Scott & Frédéric Delmar. (2004). Planning for the Market: Business Planning Before Marketing and the Continuation of Organizing Efforts. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
10.
Delmar, Frédéric & Scott Shane. (2004). Legitimating First: Organizing Activities and the Survival of New Ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal.23 indexed citations
11.
Wiklund, Johan, Frédéric Delmar, & Karin Sjöberg. (2004). Selection of the Fittest? How Human Capital affects High-Potential Entrepreneurship. Lund University Publications (Lund University).1 indexed citations
12.
Delmar, Frédéric & Scott Shane. (2003). Does Business Planning Facilitate the Development of New Ventures. SSRN Electronic Journal.19 indexed citations
13.
Delmar, Frédéric & Scott Shane. (2003). Does the Order of Organizing Activities Matter for New Venture Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
14.
Delmar, Frédéric & Per Davidsson. (2002). Les entreprises a forte croissance et leur contribution a l’emploi: le cas de la Suede 1987-1996. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
15.
Delmar, Frédéric & Scott Shane. (2002). What Firm Founders Do: A Longitudinal Study of the Start-Up Process. SSRN Electronic Journal.16 indexed citations
16.
Eckhardt, Jon, Scott Shane, & Frédéric Delmar. (2002). Multi-level Selection and the Funding of New Ventures. Lund University Publications (Lund University).1 indexed citations
17.
Delmar, Frédéric, et al.. (2000). How Do Self-Employed Parents of Nascent Entrepreneurs Contribute?. SSRN Electronic Journal.15 indexed citations
18.
Delmar, Frédéric & Per Davidsson. (2000). Where Do They Come from? Prevalence and Characteristics of Nascent Entrepreneurs. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).6 indexed citations
19.
Delmar, Frédéric, et al.. (1999). Firm Size Expectations of Nascent Entrepreneurs. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).16 indexed citations
20.
Davidsson, Per & Frédéric Delmar. (1999). Firm Size Expectations of Nascent Entrepreneurs. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.