Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Béchet
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Béchet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Béchet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Béchet more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Béchet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Béchet. The network helps show where Frédéric Béchet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frédéric Béchet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frédéric Béchet.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frédéric Béchet based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frédéric Béchet. Frédéric Béchet is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Danieli, Morena, et al.. (2016). Summarizing Behaviours: An Experiment on the Annotation of Call-Centre Conversations. Language Resources and Evaluation. 4430–4433.1 indexed citations
Charlet, Delphine, MinYoung Kim, Benoît Favre, et al.. (2015). PERCOLATTE : A Multimodal Person Discovery System in TV Broadcast for the Medieval 2015 Evaluation Campaign.. MediaEval.1 indexed citations
Ellouze, Mariem, et al.. (2014). De l'arabe standard vers l'arabe dialectal : projection de corpus et ressources linguistiques en vue du traitement automatique de l'oral dans les médias tunisiens. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 55. 73–96.7 indexed citations
8.
Béchet, Frédéric, et al.. (2013). Experiments with DBpedia, WordNet and SentiWordNet as resources for sentiment analysis in micro-blogging. Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. 455–459.32 indexed citations
9.
Béchet, Frédéric, et al.. (2012). DECODA: a call-centre human-human spoken conversation corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1343–1347.28 indexed citations
10.
Béchet, Frédéric, et al.. (2011). Coopération de méthodes statistiques et symboliques pour l'adaptation non-supervisée d'un système d'étiquetage en entités nommées. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
Meurs, Marie‐Jean, et al.. (2008). Annotation en Frames Sémantiques du corpus de dialogue MEDIA.. 199–208.1 indexed citations
14.
Raymond, Christian, Frédéric Béchet, Renato De Mori, & Géraldine Damnati. (2004). On the Use of Confidence for Statistical Decision in Dialogue Strategies. Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 102–107.4 indexed citations
15.
Devillers, Laurence, Sophie Rosset, Patrick Paroubek, et al.. (2004). The French MEDIA/EVALDA Project: the Evaluation of the Understanding Capability of Spoken Language Dialogue Systems.. Language Resources and Evaluation.21 indexed citations
16.
Béchet, Frédéric, Giuseppe Riccardi, & Dilek Hakkani‐Tür. (2004). Mining Spoken Dialogue Corpora for System Evaluation and Modelin.. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 134–141.12 indexed citations
Mareüil, Philippe Boula de, François Yvon, Christophe d’Alessandro, et al.. (1998). Evaluation of grapheme-to phoneme conversion for text-to-speech synthesis in French. Language Resources and Evaluation. 641–646.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.