Fred E. Tosh

1.4k citations
42 papers · 988 indexed · h-index 18

Fred E. Tosh

39 papers receiving 786 citations

Peers

Fred E. Tosh
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Microbiology 34
  • Infectious Diseases 578
  • Epidemiology 700
  • Small Animals 136
  • Cell Biology 159
Replace Chapman H. Binford with:
Chapman H. Binford United States
Rose McAleer Australia
H. I. Lurie South Africa
Mireille M. Kattar Lebanon
Joan L. Longbottom United Kingdom
Z. U. Khan India
John H. Seabury United States
Ernest W. Chick United States
Susan E. Hoover United States
Birgit Spieß Germany
Fred E. Tosh relative to Chapman H. Binford United States Chapman H. Binford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Chapman H. Binford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred E. Tosh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred E. Tosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred E. Tosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred E. Tosh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred E. Tosh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred E. Tosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred E. Tosh. The network helps show where Fred E. Tosh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred E. Tosh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred E. Tosh Line = papers co-authored together Fred E. Tosh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
A Decade of Experience with Blastomycosis and Its Treatment with Amphotericin B
20150
2
Pulmonary Cryptococcosis: Clinical Forms and Treatment
20151
3 197439
4
Acute Reinfection Pulmonary Histoplasmosis
19737
5 1973104
6 197328
7 197356
8 197212
9 197117
10 197112
11
Pulmonary aspergillosis in sanatoriums in the south central United States.
197017
12 197011
13 197041
14 196725
15 19675
16 196657
17 196443
18 196414
19
Toxicity and absorption studies in Humans of newer antifungal agents.
19616
20 196153

About Fred E. Tosh

Fred E. Tosh is a scholar working on Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, Small Animals, Epidemiology and Immunology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal Infections and Studies (31 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (17 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (7 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (7 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers) and Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (34 citations), Infectious Diseases (578 citations), Epidemiology (700 citations), Small Animals (136 citations) and Cell Biology (159 citations). Fred E. Tosh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Uganda and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include George A. Sarosi, Kenneth J. Hammerman, Irene L. Doto, Robert J. Weeks, Michael L. Furcolow, Tribhawan S. Vats, James T. Lowman, Antone A. Medeiros, James D. A. Parker and K E Powell. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Epidemiology, New England Journal of Medicine, Mycopathologia, The Journal of Pediatrics and Annals of Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026