Franziska Geiser

3.2k total citations
125 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Franziska Geiser is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Franziska Geiser has authored 125 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Clinical Psychology, 44 papers in General Health Professions and 24 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Franziska Geiser's work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (19 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (18 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (15 papers). Franziska Geiser is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (19 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (18 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (15 papers). Franziska Geiser collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Franziska Geiser's co-authors include Rupert Conrad, Reinhard Liedtke, Katrin Imbierowicz, Ingo Wegener, Yeşim Erim, Christian Albus, Nina Hiebel, Petra Beschoner, Eva Morawa and Lucia Jerg‐Bretzke and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Pain and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Franziska Geiser

116 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Franziska Geiser Germany 26 762 515 369 212 198 125 2.0k
Alyson Ross United States 22 822 1.1× 514 1.0× 160 0.4× 163 0.8× 223 1.1× 45 2.0k
Karen M. Stechuchak United States 26 464 0.6× 476 0.9× 305 0.8× 288 1.4× 280 1.4× 89 2.2k
M. Graça Pereira Portugal 24 502 0.7× 382 0.7× 212 0.6× 86 0.4× 318 1.6× 237 2.1k
Maria Francesca Moro Italy 22 598 0.8× 298 0.6× 419 1.1× 169 0.8× 100 0.5× 86 1.5k
Lan Yu United States 15 423 0.6× 285 0.6× 217 0.6× 507 2.4× 131 0.7× 24 1.9k
Amit Sood United States 26 899 1.2× 817 1.6× 180 0.5× 92 0.4× 253 1.3× 84 2.5k
Emanuele Maria Giusti Italy 19 572 0.8× 433 0.8× 210 0.6× 77 0.4× 95 0.5× 60 1.5k
Lauren Terhorst United States 25 212 0.3× 436 0.8× 318 0.9× 172 0.8× 129 0.7× 133 1.8k
Kurt Fritzsche Germany 25 421 0.6× 608 1.2× 611 1.7× 139 0.7× 234 1.2× 147 2.1k
Tana Fishman New Zealand 11 445 0.6× 394 0.8× 208 0.6× 158 0.7× 68 0.3× 15 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Franziska Geiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Franziska Geiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Franziska Geiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Franziska Geiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Franziska Geiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Franziska Geiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Franziska Geiser. The network helps show where Franziska Geiser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Franziska Geiser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Franziska Geiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Franziska Geiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Franziska Geiser. Franziska Geiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ernstmann, Nicole, Marc Dohmen, Franziska Geiser, et al.. (2024). Feasibility of a complex psychosocial intervention for families with parental cancer: acceptability, suitability, implementability, and perceived support. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 150(10). 464–464. 1 indexed citations
2.
Breidenbach, Clara, et al.. (2024). Coping with breast cancer during medical and occupational rehabilitation: a qualitative study of strategies and contextual factors. BMC Women s Health. 24(1). 183–183. 2 indexed citations
3.
5.
Richter, Peter, André Karger, Nicole Ernstmann, et al.. (2023). Caring for dependent children impacts practical and emotional problems and need for support, but not perceived distress among cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology. 32(8). 1231–1239. 3 indexed citations
6.
Geiser, Franziska, et al.. (2023). Wie kann Resilienz prozessorientiert beschrieben werden und hat das Bedeutung für die Psychotherapie? Ein qualitativer Beitrag. Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie. 69(4). 316–330.
7.
Goerling, Ute, Christian Albus, Corinna Bergelt, et al.. (2023). Predictors of cancer patients' utilization of psychooncological support: Examining patient´s attitude and physician´s recommendation. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 149(20). 17997–18004. 6 indexed citations
9.
Clemens, Vera, Petra Beschoner, Marc N. Jarczok, et al.. (2021). The mediating role of COVID-19-related burden in the association between adverse childhood experiences and emotional exhaustion: results of the egePan – VOICE study. European journal of psychotraumatology. 12(1). 1976441–1976441. 7 indexed citations
10.
Breidenbach, Clara, Christoph Kowalski, Anna Enders, et al.. (2021). Individual courses and determinants of fear of cancer recurrence in long-term breast cancer survivors with and without recurrence. Supportive Care in Cancer. 29(12). 7647–7657. 7 indexed citations
11.
Jerg‐Bretzke, Lucia, Marc N. Jarczok, Katja Weimer, et al.. (2021). Psychosocial Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers and Initial Areas of Action for Intervention and Prevention—The egePan/VOICE Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(19). 10531–10531. 21 indexed citations
12.
Radbruch, Lukas, et al.. (2021). An den Grenzen des Messbaren.
13.
Dreher, Annegret, et al.. (2019). Prevalence of burnout among German general practitioners: Comparison of physicians working in solo and group practices. PLoS ONE. 14(2). e0211223–e0211223. 49 indexed citations
14.
Ernstmann, Nicole, et al.. (2019). Psycho-oncology care in breast cancer centres: a nationwide survey. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 10(4). e36–e36. 5 indexed citations
15.
Karger, André, et al.. (2017). Communication Skills Trainings: Subjective Appraisal of Physicians from Five Cancer Centres in North Rhine, Germany. Oncology Research and Treatment. 40(9). 496–501. 8 indexed citations
16.
Conrad, Rupert, et al.. (2014). Temperament and Character Personality Profile and Illness-Related Stress in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy. The Scientific World JOURNAL. 2014. 1–7. 51 indexed citations
17.
Geiser, Franziska, Rupert Conrad, Katrin Imbierowicz, et al.. (2011). Coagulation activation and fibrinolysis impairment are reduced in patients with anxiety and depression when medicated with serotonergic antidepressants. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 65(5). 518–525. 38 indexed citations
18.
Geiser, Franziska, et al.. (2009). Bonner Evaluationsstudie ambulanter tiefenpsychologischer Psychotherapie. 8(1). 47–53.
19.
Conrad, Rupert, et al.. (2009). Temperament and character personality profile in relation to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in major depressed patients. Psychiatry Research. 170(2-3). 212–217. 62 indexed citations
20.
Conrad, Rupert, Ingo Wegener, Katrin Imbierowicz, Reinhard Liedtke, & Franziska Geiser. (2008). Alexithymia, temperament and character as predictors of psychopathology in patients with major depression. Psychiatry Research. 165(1-2). 137–144. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026