Frank Kloss
- Biomedical Engineering top 1%
- Oral Surgery top 0.2%
- Surgery top 2%
- Urology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Stefan Schultze–MosgauRobert GaßnerEmeka NkenkeFriedrich Wilhelm NeukamRalf SmeetsMax HeilandGünter LepperdingerKarl Andreas Schlegel
- Topics
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (25 papers)Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (15 papers)Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Oral SurgeryUrologyOrthodontics
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of Immunology
In The Last Decade
Frank Kloss
74 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Biomedical Engineering 1.6k
- Oral Surgery 1.5k
- Surgery 1.3k
- Urology 844
- Molecular Biology 496
Countries citing papers authored by Frank Kloss
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Kloss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Kloss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Kloss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Kloss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Kloss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Kloss. The network helps show where Frank Kloss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank Kloss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank Kloss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank Kloss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank Kloss. Frank Kloss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials – From space holders to innovative biomaterialsbreakdown → | 368 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 398 | |
| 15 | Dentoalveoläre Traumen: Analyse von 4763 Patienten mit 6237 Verletzungen in 10 Jahren | 2 |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 221 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 269 |
About Frank Kloss
Frank Kloss is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, Urology and Orthodontics, having authored 75 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (25 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (15 papers) and Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (1.5k citations), Urology (844 citations) and Orthodontics (403 citations). Frank Kloss has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Schultze–Mosgau, Robert Gaßner, Emeka Nkenke, Friedrich Wilhelm Neukam, Ralf Smeets, Max Heiland, Günter Lepperdinger, Karl Andreas Schlegel, J. Wiltfang and Regina Brunauer. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Journal of Immunology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.