Anke Krueger
- Materials Chemistry top 1%
- Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research 46
- Carbon Nanotubes in Composites 19
- Geophysics top 2%
-
- Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications 9
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 6
- Biomedical Engineering top 2%
- Bone Tissue Engineering Materials 7
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications 6
-
- Fullerene Chemistry and Applications 9
-
- Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies 6
Anke Krueger
77 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Materials Chemistry 4.2k
- Geophysics 669
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.6k
- Biomedical Engineering 1.3k
- Biomaterials 302
Countries citing papers authored by Anke Krueger
This map shows the geographic impact of Anke Krueger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke Krueger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke Krueger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anke Krueger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke Krueger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke Krueger. The network helps show where Anke Krueger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anke Krueger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 51 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 20 | Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditionsbreakdown → | 2008 | 1404 |
About Anke Krueger
Anke Krueger is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (46 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (19 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (9 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (7 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (6 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (6 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (4.2k citations), Geophysics (669 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.6k citations). Anke Krueger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Daniel G. Lang, Yuejiang Liang, Fedor Jelezko, Jörg Wrachtrup, Alfred Leitenstorfer, Chang S. Shin, Julia Tisler, Rudolf Bratschitsch, Roman Kolesov and Tobias Hanke. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry - A European Journal, Chemical Communications, Diamond and Related Materials, Journal of Materials Chemistry B and Advanced Functional Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.