Frank K. Upham
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Law top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Robert J. SmithSetsuo MiyazawaJohn W. DowerJennifer RobertsonAkira IriyeKent E. CalderRonald A. CraigNorma Field
- Topics
- Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (5 papers)Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 papers)Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Frank K. Upham
27 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Sociology and Political Science 191
- Political Science and International Relations 164
- Law 146
- Economics and Econometrics 61
- Strategy and Management 56
Countries citing papers authored by Frank K. Upham
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank K. Upham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank K. Upham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank K. Upham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frank K. Upham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank K. Upham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank K. Upham. The network helps show where Frank K. Upham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank K. Upham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank K. Upham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank K. Upham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank K. Upham. Frank K. Upham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | The Evolution of Relational Property Rights: A Case of Chinese Rural Land Reform | 5 |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | Japanese Legal Reform in Institutional, Ideological, and Comparative Perspective | 3 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Stealth Activism: Norm Formation by Japanese Courts | 4 |
| 7 | Reflections on the Rule of Law in China | 4 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | Who Will Find the Defendant if He Stays with His Sheep? Justice in Rural China | 17 |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | Privatized Regulation: Japanese Regulatory Style in Comparative and International Perspective | 15 |
| 13 | The Role of Lawyers in Social Change: United States | 1 |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 108 | |
| 18 | 145 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Frank K. Upham
Frank K. Upham is a scholar working on Law, Soil Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 28 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (5 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (146 citations), Political Science and International Relations (164 citations) and Cultural Studies (50 citations). Frank K. Upham has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Smith, Setsuo Miyazawa, John W. Dower, Jennifer Robertson, Akira Iriye, Kent E. Calder, Ronald A. Craig, Norma Field and John O. Haley. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, Law & Society Review and The Yale Law Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.