Frank E. Cheney

505 total citations
10 papers, 396 citations indexed

About

Frank E. Cheney is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Frank E. Cheney has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 396 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ophthalmology, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Frank E. Cheney's work include Ocular and Laser Science Research (8 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers). Frank E. Cheney is often cited by papers focused on Ocular and Laser Science Research (8 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers). Frank E. Cheney collaborates with scholars based in United States. Frank E. Cheney's co-authors include Larry N. Thibos, David J. Walsh, Joseph A. Zuclich, Bruce E. Stuck, Harry Zwick, Peter R. Edsall, Donald A. Gagliano, David J. Lund, Arthur Bradley and Phelps P. Crump and has published in prestigious journals such as Vision Research, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Health Physics.

In The Last Decade

Frank E. Cheney

8 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Frank E. Cheney United States	8	274	186	145	129	55	10	396
Ulker Tulunay Keesey United States	9	424 1.5×	130 0.7×	89 0.6×	87 0.7×	27 0.5×	13	517
A. van Meeteren Netherlands	9	340 1.2×	163 0.9×	52 0.4×	168 1.3×	91 1.7×	14	492
Clifton Schor United States	9	378 1.4×	145 0.8×	38 0.3×	218 1.7×	38 0.7×	16	470
Dale Allen United States	11	250 0.9×	79 0.4×	55 0.4×	121 0.9×	57 1.0×	14	384
Evanne J. Casson Canada	11	202 0.7×	149 0.8×	40 0.3×	107 0.8×	93 1.7×	21	416
Roger L. Boltz United States	12	350 1.3×	80 0.4×	111 0.8×	168 1.3×	59 1.1×	18	437
David L. Still United States	7	215 0.8×	166 0.9×	43 0.3×	250 1.9×	114 2.1×	19	449
D. M. Levi United States	6	460 1.7×	73 0.4×	78 0.5×	218 1.7×	40 0.7×	13	501
Jianliang Tong United States	13	286 1.0×	113 0.6×	53 0.4×	136 1.1×	40 0.7×	29	390
T. C. A. Jenkins United Kingdom	14	309 1.1×	211 1.1×	48 0.3×	264 2.0×	56 1.0×	29	508

Countries citing papers authored by Frank E. Cheney

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frank E. Cheney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank E. Cheney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank E. Cheney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frank E. Cheney

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank E. Cheney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank E. Cheney. The network helps show where Frank E. Cheney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frank E. Cheney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frank E. Cheney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frank E. Cheney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frank E. Cheney. Frank E. Cheney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Cheney, Frank E., Larry N. Thibos, & Arthur Bradley. (2014). Effect of ocular transverse chromatic aberration on detection acuity for peripheral vision. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 35(1). 70–80. 8 indexed citations

2.

Zuclich, Joseph A., et al.. (1998). Ophthalmoscopic and pathologic description of ocular damage induced by infrared laser radiation. Journal of Laser Applications. 10(3). 114–120. 14 indexed citations

3.

Zuclich, Joseph A., Harry Zwick, Stephen A. Boppart, et al.. (1997). A comparison of laser-induced retinal damage from infrared wavelengths to that from visible wavelengths. 8(1). 15–29. 8 indexed citations

4.

Zuclich, Joseph A., et al.. (1997). Ophthalmoscopic and pathologic description of ocular damage induced by infrared laser radiation. 144–153.

5.

Zuclich, Joseph A., et al.. (1996). <title>Comparing laser-induced retinal damage from ir wavelengths to that from visible wavelengths</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 2674. 66–79. 10 indexed citations

6.

Zuclich, Joseph A., Donald A. Gagliano, Frank E. Cheney, et al.. (1995). Ocular effects of penetrating IR laser wavelengths. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 29 indexed citations

7.

Cheney, Frank E., et al.. (1993). Probability-summation Model of Multiple Laser-exposure Effects. Health Physics. 65(5). 523–528. 13 indexed citations

8.

Roach, William P., Mark E. Rogers, Benjamin A. Rockwell, et al.. (1992). Ultrashort laser pulses: Effects and theories.

9.

Thibos, Larry N., et al.. (1987). Vision beyond the resolution limit: Aliasing in the periphery. Vision Research. 27(12). 2193–2197. 112 indexed citations

10.

Thibos, Larry N., Frank E. Cheney, & David J. Walsh. (1987). Retinal limits to the detection and resolution of gratings. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 4(8). 1524–1524. 202 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact