François Fourchet

3.4k total citations · 4 hit papers
19 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

François Fourchet is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, François Fourchet has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 10 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in François Fourchet's work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (17 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (10 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (10 papers). François Fourchet is often cited by papers focused on Foot and Ankle Surgery (17 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (10 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (10 papers). François Fourchet collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, France and United States. François Fourchet's co-authors include Patrick O. McKeon, Kathryn M. Refshauge, Daniel Tik-Pui Fong, Thomas W. Kaminski, Chris Bleakley, Carrie L. Docherty, Eamonn Delahunt, Erik A. Wikstrom, Jay Hertel and Claire E. Hiller and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Sports Medicine, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy and Clinical Biomechanics.

In The Last Decade

François Fourchet

16 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Hit Papers

Selection criteria for pa... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 2013 2016 2013 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
François Fourchet Switzerland 11 2.3k 1.0k 419 76 55 19 2.3k
Tricia J. Hubbard United States 23 1.6k 0.7× 766 0.8× 506 1.2× 81 1.1× 59 1.1× 29 1.8k
Masafumi Terada Japan 24 1.3k 0.6× 595 0.6× 254 0.6× 101 1.3× 74 1.3× 70 1.4k
Lauren C. Olmsted-Kramer United States 7 1.0k 0.4× 536 0.5× 226 0.5× 95 1.3× 21 0.4× 9 1.2k
Kyle B. Kosik United States 16 711 0.3× 326 0.3× 144 0.3× 71 0.9× 42 0.8× 54 802
Stephen F. Reischl United States 13 961 0.4× 552 0.5× 354 0.8× 58 0.8× 13 0.2× 18 1.1k
Kelly Sheerin New Zealand 9 646 0.3× 411 0.4× 233 0.6× 101 1.3× 19 0.3× 25 874
Roel De Ridder Belgium 18 664 0.3× 457 0.4× 237 0.6× 90 1.2× 13 0.2× 54 923
Jurdan Mendiguchía Spain 27 2.1k 1.0× 626 0.6× 686 1.6× 126 1.7× 14 0.3× 52 2.2k
Susan L. Rozzi United States 5 842 0.4× 512 0.5× 499 1.2× 57 0.8× 12 0.2× 8 1.1k
Sayers John Miller United States 13 626 0.3× 339 0.3× 337 0.8× 101 1.3× 12 0.2× 22 903

Countries citing papers authored by François Fourchet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of François Fourchet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by François Fourchet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites François Fourchet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by François Fourchet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by François Fourchet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by François Fourchet. The network helps show where François Fourchet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of François Fourchet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of François Fourchet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of François Fourchet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with François Fourchet. François Fourchet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
4.
Fourchet, François, et al.. (2024). Ankle-GO score is associated with the probability of becoming coper after lateral ankle sprain: a 1-year prospective cohort study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 58(19). 1115–1122. 3 indexed citations
5.
Fourchet, François, et al.. (2024). Reliability of isokinetic dynamometer for isometric assessment of ankle plantar flexor strength. Physical Therapy in Sport. 71. 36–42. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lopes, Ronny, et al.. (2023). Development and Validation of the Ankle-GO Score for Discriminating and Predicting Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Lateral Ankle Sprain. Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach. 16(1). 47–57. 10 indexed citations
9.
Forestier, Nicolas, et al.. (2021). The Star Excursion Balance Test: An Update Review and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Athletic Therapy & Training. 26(6). 285–293. 50 indexed citations
10.
Delahunt, Eamonn, Chris Bleakley, Brian Caulfield, et al.. (2018). Infographic. International Ankle Consortium Rehabilitation-Oriented Assessment. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 53(19). 1248–1249. 4 indexed citations
11.
Delahunt, Eamonn, Chris Bleakley, Brian Caulfield, et al.. (2018). Clinical assessment of acute lateral ankle sprain injuries (ROAST): 2019 consensus statement and recommendations of the International Ankle Consortium. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 52(20). 1304–1310. 158 indexed citations
12.
Fourchet, François, et al.. (2017). Influence de la distance de course sur les blessures musculo-squelettiques en ultra-trail. 34(3). 21–27. 1 indexed citations
13.
Gribble, Phillip A., Chris Bleakley, Brian Caulfield, et al.. (2016). Evidence review for the 2016 International Ankle Consortium consensus statement on the prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 50(24). 1496–1505. 429 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Gribble, Phillip A., Chris Bleakley, Brian Caulfield, et al.. (2016). 2016 consensus statement of the International Ankle Consortium: prevalence, impact and long-term consequences of lateral ankle sprains. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 50(24). 1493–1495. 186 indexed citations
15.
Degache, Francis, et al.. (2016). Assessment of evertor weakness in patients with chronic ankle instability: Functional versus isokinetic testing. Clinical Biomechanics. 41. 54–59. 20 indexed citations
16.
Gribble, Phillip A., Eamonn Delahunt, Chris Bleakley, et al.. (2013). Selection Criteria for Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability in Controlled Research: A Position Statement of the International Ankle Consortium. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 43(8). 585–591. 438 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Gribble, Phillip A., Eamonn Delahunt, Chris Bleakley, et al.. (2013). Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 48(13). 1014–1018. 629 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Gribble, Phillip A., Eamonn Delahunt, Chris Bleakley, et al.. (2013). Selection Criteria for Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability in Controlled Research: A Position Statement of the International Ankle Consortium. Journal of Athletic Training. 49(1). 121–127. 344 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Édouard, Pascal, Jean‐Claude Chatard, François Fourchet, et al.. (2011). Invertor and evertor strength in track and field athletes with functional ankle instability. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 19(2). 91–96. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026