Francisco Conget
- Internal Medicine top 0.5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Fernando UresandiRemedios OteroDolores NauffalDavid JiménezMiguel Ángel CabezudoMikel OribeElena LasernaRoger D. Yusen
- Topics
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (13 papers)Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers)Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Internal MedicineCritical Care and Intensive Care MedicineCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Francisco Conget
15 papers receiving 638 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Internal Medicine 589
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 350
- Epidemiology 189
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 134
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 130
Countries citing papers authored by Francisco Conget
This map shows the geographic impact of Francisco Conget's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francisco Conget with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francisco Conget more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francisco Conget
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francisco Conget. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francisco Conget. The network helps show where Francisco Conget may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francisco Conget
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francisco Conget. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francisco Conget based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francisco Conget. Francisco Conget is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 83 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 153 | |
| 10 | 46 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 64 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 |
About Francisco Conget
Francisco Conget is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 658 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (13 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (589 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (130 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (350 citations). Francisco Conget has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Fernando Uresandi, Remedios Otero, Dolores Nauffal, David Jiménez, Miguel Ángel Cabezudo, Mikel Oribe, Elena Laserna, Roger D. Yusen, Aurelio Cayuela and Manuel Monréal. Their work appears in journals such as CHEST Journal, Thorax and Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.