Francis O’Gorman
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 10%
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Topics
- Historical Art and Culture Studies (5 papers)Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers)Modernist Literature and Criticism (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Modern Language ReviewStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandRussia
In The Last Decade
Francis O’Gorman
26 papers receiving 52 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Literature and Literary Theory 48
- Sociology and Political Science 21
- History 20
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 12
- Social Psychology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Francis O’Gorman
This map shows the geographic impact of Francis O’Gorman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francis O’Gorman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francis O’Gorman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francis O’Gorman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francis O’Gorman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francis O’Gorman. The network helps show where Francis O’Gorman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francis O’Gorman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francis O’Gorman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francis O’Gorman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francis O’Gorman. Francis O’Gorman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes, and the Victorian Media | 0 |
| 8 | The hound of the Baskervilles : another adventure of Sherlock Holmes ; with "The adventure of the speckled band" | 0 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Victorian poetry : an annotated anthology | 12 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Ruskin, Vernon Lee, and the cultural possession of Italy | 1 |
| 18 | Ruskin and Particularity: Fors Clavigera and the 1870s | 1 |
| 19 | Rationality and relativity : the quest for objective knowledge | 2 |
| 20 | 0 |
About Francis O’Gorman
Francis O’Gorman is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Museology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 43 papers that have together received 94 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Art and Culture Studies (5 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (4 papers) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (48 citations), Museology (10 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (12 citations). Francis O’Gorman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Katherine Turner, Clive Wilmer, Arthur Conan Doyle and Alan T. Davis. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Modern Language Review and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.