Francien Dechesne
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 7
- Logic, programming, and type systems 3
- Information Systems top 10%
- Information and Cyber Security 5
-
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI 4
-
- Privacy, Security, and Data Protection 6
- Access Control and Trust 4
-
- European Criminal Justice and Data Protection 4
-
- Game Theory and Voting Systems 3
Francien Dechesne
29 papers receiving 290 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Artificial Intelligence 145
- Information Systems 68
- Management Science and Operations Research 31
- Safety Research 19
- Computer Science Applications 12
Countries citing papers authored by Francien Dechesne
This map shows the geographic impact of Francien Dechesne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francien Dechesne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francien Dechesne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francien Dechesne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francien Dechesne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francien Dechesne. The network helps show where Francien Dechesne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Francien Dechesne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 5 | Consumer Control of Energy Data: The Need for the Consent Management Mechanism in the Energy Sector of the Netherlands and Roadblocks Related to its Implementation | 2019 | 1 |
| 6 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 7 | De bescherming van persoonsgegevens: acht Europese landen vergeleken | 2017 | 0 |
| 8 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 14 | (Cyber) security in smart grid pilots | 2013 | 1 |
| 15 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 22 | |
| 19 | Equivalence and quantifier rules in logic with imperfect information | 2007 | 1 |
| 20 | 2005 | 2 |
About Francien Dechesne
Francien Dechesne is a scholar working on Law, Safety Research and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 31 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (6 papers), Information and Cyber Security (5 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (4 papers), Access Control and Trust (4 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (145 citations), Information Systems (68 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (31 citations). Francien Dechesne has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Bolivia. Frequent co-authors include S. van der Hof, Bart Custers, Alan Sears, Virginia Dignum, Yanjing Wang, Tim Janssen, Wolter Pieters, Xavier Caicedo, Frank Dignum and Gennaro Di Tosto. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Synthese and IEEE Security & Privacy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.