Francesco Viola
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Water Science and Technology top 1%
- Environmental Engineering top 2%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Leonardo NotoDario PumoMarcella CannarozzoRoberto DeiddaGoffredo La LoggiaDomenico CaraccioloElena CristianoFrancesco Lo Conti
- Topics
- Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (23 papers)Hydrology and Drought Analysis (20 papers)Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesGreece
In The Last Decade
Francesco Viola
68 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
- Water Science and Technology 702
- Environmental Engineering 548
- Atmospheric Science 489
- Ecology 221
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Viola
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Viola's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Viola with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Viola more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Viola
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Viola. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Viola. The network helps show where Francesco Viola may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Viola
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Viola. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Viola based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Viola. Francesco Viola is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 101 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Il primo libro de madrigali a quatro voci : Venice, 1550 | 2 |
About Francesco Viola
Francesco Viola is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology and Industrial relations, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (23 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (20 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations), Water Science and Technology (702 citations) and Environmental Engineering (548 citations). Francesco Viola has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Leonardo Noto, Dario Pumo, Marcella Cannarozzo, Roberto Deidda, Goffredo La Loggia, Domenico Caracciolo, Elena Cristiano, Francesco Lo Conti, Annalisa Di Piazza and Lorena Liuzzo. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment and Water Resources Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.