Francesco Nazzi
- Insect Science top 0.05%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.2%
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Parasitology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Francesco PennacchioDesiderato AnnosciaGennaro Di PriscoEmilio CaprioPaola VarricchioYves Le ConteGiorgio Della VedovaN. Milani
- Topics
- Insect and Pesticide Research (49 papers)Plant and animal studies (39 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (37 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Francesco Nazzi
61 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Insect Science 3.3k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.7k
- Genetics 2.6k
- Plant Science 416
- Parasitology 112
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Nazzi
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Nazzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Nazzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Nazzi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Nazzi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Nazzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Nazzi. The network helps show where Francesco Nazzi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Nazzi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Nazzi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Nazzi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Nazzi. Francesco Nazzi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 58 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | An investigation into possible causes of tick proliferation in a Pre-Alpine Valley in Northeastern Italy | 1 |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Francesco Nazzi
Francesco Nazzi is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 62 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (49 papers), Plant and animal studies (39 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (37 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (3.3k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.7k citations) and Genetics (2.6k citations). Francesco Nazzi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Pennacchio, Desiderato Annoscia, Gennaro Di Prisco, Emilio Caprio, Paola Varricchio, Yves Le Conte, Giorgio Della Vedova, N. Milani, Fabio Del Piccolo and Giuseppe Gargiulo. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.