Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Flavor symmetry and the static potential with hypercubic blocking
2001478 citationsAnna Hasenfratz, Francesco KnechtliPhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Knechtli
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Knechtli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Knechtli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Knechtli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Knechtli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Knechtli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Knechtli. The network helps show where Francesco Knechtli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Knechtli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Knechtli.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Knechtli based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Knechtli. Francesco Knechtli is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Leder, Björn & Francesco Knechtli. (2011). The shape of the static potential with dynamical fermions. 315.3 indexed citations
13.
Knechtli, Francesco, Tomasz Korzec, Björn Leder, & Ulli Wolff. (2004). Universality in the Gross-Neveu model.1 indexed citations
14.
Bunk, B., Michele Della Morte, K. Jansen, & Francesco Knechtli. (2004). The locality problem for two tastes of staggered fermions ∗.4 indexed citations
15.
Sommer, Rainer, Sinya Aoki, Michele Della Morte, et al.. (2003). 1 Large cutoff effects of dynamical Wilson fermions ∗.20 indexed citations
16.
Hasenfratz, Anna & Francesco Knechtli. (2002). Simulation of dynamical fermions with smeared links.14 indexed citations
17.
Knechtli, Francesco, Michele Della Morte, Juri Rolf, et al.. (2002). 1 Running quark mass in two flavor QCD ∗.8 indexed citations
18.
Hasenfratz, Anna & Francesco Knechtli. (2002). 1 The phase diagram of QCD with two and four flavors: results with HYP fermions ∗.2 indexed citations
19.
Hasenfratz, Anna & Francesco Knechtli. (2001). Four Flavor Finite Temperature Phase Transition with HYP Action: Where is the First Order Endpoint?. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
20.
Knechtli, Francesco & Anna Hasenfratz. (2001). Dynamical fermions with fat links. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 63(11).22 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.