Francesco Gambi
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gianna SepedeDomenico De BerardisRosa Maria SalernoFilippo Maria FerroMarco OnofrjDaniela CampanellaAntonio FerrettiD. Gambi
- Topics
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Francesco Gambi
43 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Psychiatry and Mental health 753
- Clinical Psychology 638
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 300
- Pharmacology 268
- Cognitive Neuroscience 266
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Gambi
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Gambi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Gambi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Gambi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Gambi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Gambi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Gambi. The network helps show where Francesco Gambi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Gambi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Gambi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Gambi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Gambi. Francesco Gambi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 46 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 134 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 134 | |
| 10 | 117 | |
| 11 | 73 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 104 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 82 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Francesco Gambi
Francesco Gambi is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (205 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (753 citations) and Clinical Psychology (638 citations). Francesco Gambi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gianna Sepede, Domenico De Berardis, Rosa Maria Salerno, Filippo Maria Ferro, Marco Onofrj, Daniela Campanella, Antonio Ferretti, D. Gambi, Marcella Reale and Carla Iarlori. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.