Francesco Buccheri
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Giuseppe WerberRenato NotoReinhold EggerG. CUSMANOMichelangelo GruttadauriaPasquale SodanoDominic OliverJoanna Hale
- Topics
- Topological Materials and Phenomena (14 papers)Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (13 papers)Synthesis and biological activity (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Francesco Buccheri
39 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Organic Chemistry 192
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 169
- Materials Chemistry 79
- Condensed Matter Physics 66
- Social Psychology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Buccheri
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Buccheri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Buccheri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Buccheri more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Buccheri
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Buccheri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Buccheri. The network helps show where Francesco Buccheri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Buccheri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Buccheri. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Buccheri based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Buccheri. Francesco Buccheri is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Francesco Buccheri
Francesco Buccheri is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topological Materials and Phenomena (14 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (13 papers) and Synthesis and biological activity (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (192 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (66 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (169 citations). Francesco Buccheri has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Giuseppe Werber, Renato Noto, Reinhold Egger, G. CUSMANO, Michelangelo Gruttadauria, Pasquale Sodano, Dominic Oliver, Joanna Hale, Antonia F. de C. Hamilton and Jamie A. Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and Nuclear Physics B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.