Francesca De Monte

422 citations
22 papers · 259 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Francesca De Monte

18 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Francesca De Monte
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 114
  • Radiation 25
  • Otorhinolaryngology 11
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Neurology 31
Replace Francesca Capoccetti with:
Francesca Capoccetti Italy
Verena Hartung-Knemeyer Germany
Benjapa Khiewvan Thailand
Stefan Knippen Germany
Paul‐Stefan Mauz Germany
Jedidiah M. Monson United States
Gemma Eminowicz United Kingdom
Emma D’Ippolito Italy
Shakher Ramdave Australia
Anhui Shi China
Francesca De Monte relative to Francesca Capoccetti Italy Francesca Capoccetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Francesca Capoccetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Francesca De Monte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Francesca De Monte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesca De Monte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesca De Monte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Francesca De Monte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesca De Monte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesca De Monte. The network helps show where Francesca De Monte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Francesca De Monte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Francesca De Monte Line = papers co-authored together Francesca De Monte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Greater superficial petrosal nerve: anatomy and MR findings in perineural tumor spread.
199665
2 201933
3 201528
4 200724
5 201917
6 202115
7 201915
8 202411
9 202110
10 20189
11 20208
12 20227
13 20217
14 20243
15 20153
16 20252
17 20241
18 20231
19 20250
20 20250

About Francesca De Monte

Francesca De Monte is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Radiation and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiation Dose and Imaging (12 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (114 citations), Radiation (25 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (11 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations) and Neurology (31 citations). Francesca De Monte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ann M. Gillenwater, Lawrence E. Ginsberg, Marta Paiusco, Andrea Bettinelli, A. Scaggion, Diego Cecchin, Pietro Zucchetta, Umberto Ricardi, Pierfrancesco Franco and Olivera Ciraj‐Bjelac. Their work appears in journals such as Physica Medica, EJNMMI Physics, Medical Physics, Tomography and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact