Tomography

847 papers and 6.4k indexed citations

About

The 847 papers published in Tomography in the last decades have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Tomography usually cover Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (493 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (204 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (166 papers) specifically the topics of Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (167 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (144 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (128 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tomography are Yoganand Balagurunathan, Robert J. Gillies, André Dekker, Chunlei Liu, Robert J. Nordstrom, Matthew B. Schabath, Binsheng Zhao, Hossein Jadvar, Hongjiang Wei and Nan‐Jie Gong.

In The Last Decade

Tomography

744 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Tomography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tomography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tomography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomography more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Tomography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tomography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tomography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026