Francesca De Luca
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Neurology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Luca ProsperiniLaura De GiglioCarlo PozzilliPatrizià PantanoLetizia CastelliValentina BianchiGiovanna BorrielloNikolaos Petsas
- Topics
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (9 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers)Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationPathology and Forensic MedicinePsychiatry and Mental health
- Journals
- NeurologyScientific ReportsRadiology
In The Last Decade
Francesca De Luca
22 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 184
- Psychiatry and Mental health 103
- Neurology 53
- Cognitive Neuroscience 47
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 45
Countries citing papers authored by Francesca De Luca
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesca De Luca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesca De Luca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesca De Luca more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesca De Luca
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesca De Luca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesca De Luca. The network helps show where Francesca De Luca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesca De Luca
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesca De Luca. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesca De Luca based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesca De Luca. Francesca De Luca is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Francesca De Luca
Francesca De Luca is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 22 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (9 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (45 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (184 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (103 citations). Francesca De Luca has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Israel and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Luca Prosperini, Laura De Giglio, Carlo Pozzilli, Patrizià Pantano, Letizia Castelli, Valentina Bianchi, Giovanna Borriello, Nikolaos Petsas, Serena Ruggieri and Francesca Tona. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Scientific Reports and Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.