Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Sex differences in Alzheimer disease — the gateway to precision medicine
2018613 citationsMaria Teresa Ferretti, M. Florencia Iulita et al.Nature Reviews Neurologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Francesca Baracchi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Francesca Baracchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesca Baracchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesca Baracchi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francesca Baracchi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesca Baracchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesca Baracchi. The network helps show where Francesca Baracchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesca Baracchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesca Baracchi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesca Baracchi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Francesca Baracchi. Francesca Baracchi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Ferretti, Maria Teresa, M. Florencia Iulita, Enrica Cavedo, et al.. (2018). Sex differences in Alzheimer disease — the gateway to precision medicine. Nature Reviews Neurology. 14(8). 457–469.613 indexed citations breakdown →
Baracchi, Francesca, Ashley M. Ingiosi, Richard M. Raymond, & Mark R. Opp. (2011). Sepsis-induced alterations in sleep of rats. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 301(5). R1467–R1478.31 indexed citations
Dentico, Daniela, CA Jones, Roberto Amici, et al.. (2008). Sleep related activation of the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus following the exposure to low ambient temperature. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 17. 243–243.1 indexed citations
Amici, Roberto, Francesca Baracchi, Matteo Cerri, et al.. (2007). REM sleep homeostasis: a matter of size?. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna).1 indexed citations
15.
Baracchi, Francesca, Matteo Cerri, Daniela Dentico, et al.. (2006). Long-term aspects of REM sleep regulation in the rat.. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 99–99.1 indexed citations
Baracchi, Francesca, Roberto Amici, Matteo Cerri, et al.. (2004). Cold exposure depresses dark pulse efficiency in triggering REM sleep in the albino rat.. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 49–49.1 indexed citations
19.
Amici, Roberto, Francesca Baracchi, Matteo Cerri, et al.. (2004). EEG predictiveness of state transition from NREM sleep to REM sleep in the rat.. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 119–119.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.