Frances E. Cone

1.1k citations
13 papers · 882 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Frances E. Cone

13 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

Frances E. Cone
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Ophthalmology 740
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 387
  • Neurology 106
  • Molecular Biology 459
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 96
Replace Keiichiro Iwao with:
Keiichiro Iwao Japan
Aritz Urcola Spain
Dan Yi Wang Hong Kong
Eva Lenassi United Kingdom
Ioan M Cosma United States
Juliana Maria Ferraz Sallum Brazil
J D Lindsey United States
Ella G. Faktorovich United States
Yukiko Makiyama Japan
Haihan Jiao Australia
Frances E. Cone relative to Keiichiro Iwao Japan Keiichiro Iwao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Keiichiro Iwao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frances E. Cone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frances E. Cone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances E. Cone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances E. Cone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frances E. Cone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances E. Cone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances E. Cone. The network helps show where Frances E. Cone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Frances E. Cone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frances E. Cone Line = papers co-authored together Frances E. Cone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2009188
2 2010133
3 2012101
4 2012101
5 201386
6 201056
7 201349
8 201046
9
Mice with an induced mutation in collagen 8A2 develop larger eyes and are resistant to retinal ganglion cell damage in an experimental glaucoma model.
201241
10 201132
11 200931
12 201116
13
Studies of Scleral Microstructure, Proteomic Analysis, and Biomechanical Behavior Suggest Mechanisms of Susceptibility to Experimental Glaucoma in Mice
20122

About Frances E. Cone

Frances E. Cone is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Neurology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (13 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers) and Connexins and lens biology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (740 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (387 citations), Neurology (106 citations), Molecular Biology (459 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (96 citations). Frances E. Cone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Harry A. Quigley, Mary Ellen Pease, Scott Gelman, Ericka Oglesby, Matthew R. Steinhart, Donald J. Zack, Giedrius Kalesnykas, Thao D. Nguyen, Ronald L. Klein and William W. Hauswirth. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Cell and Tissue Research and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact