Folmer Krikken

21 papers receiving 631 citations

Hit Papers

Attribution of the Australian bushfire risk to anthropoge...2021202620222024202150100150200

Peers

Folmer Krikken
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Global and Planetary Change 463
  • Atmospheric Science 286
  • Ecology 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 59
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 59
Replace S. M. Leite with:
S. M. Leite Portugal
Fátima Espírito Santo Portugal
Beth L. Hall United States
Michael Goss United States
Tanya Lippmann Netherlands
Kate Saunders Australia
Carly R. Tozer Australia
Megan C. Kirchmeier‐Young Canada
Е. И. Пономарев Russia
Sanjit Kumar Mondal China
Folmer Krikken relative to S. M. Leite Portugal S. M. Leite's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
S. M. Leite · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Folmer Krikken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Folmer Krikken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Folmer Krikken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Folmer Krikken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Folmer Krikken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Folmer Krikken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Folmer Krikken. The network helps show where Folmer Krikken may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Folmer Krikken

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Folmer Krikken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Folmer Krikken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Folmer Krikken. Folmer Krikken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 13
3 2
4 1
5 18
6
Attribution of the Australian bushfire risk to anthropogenic climate changebreakdown →
242
7 74
8 24
9 2
10 106
11 13
12 11
13 29
14
Attribution of the role of global warming in the forest fires in Sweden 2018
1
15 32
16 21
17 14
18 7
19 24
20
Modeling lake effect snow on December 24, 2001 over Lake Erie using mesoscale models MM5 and WRF - Sensitivity to convection and microphysics schemes and the temperature of Lake Erie
1

About Folmer Krikken

Folmer Krikken is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 21 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (14 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (9 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (463 citations), Atmospheric Science (286 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (59 citations). Folmer Krikken has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Flavio Lehner, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Karsten Haustein, Richard Bintanja, Igor Drobyshev, Eveline C. van der Linden, Karin van der Wiel, Sarah Sparrow, Friederike E. L. Otto and Sihan Li. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Climate and Geophysical Research Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026