Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Phaselock Techniques
1984725 citationsFloyd M. GardnerIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cyberneticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Floyd M. Gardner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Floyd M. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Floyd M. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Floyd M. Gardner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Floyd M. Gardner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Floyd M. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Floyd M. Gardner. The network helps show where Floyd M. Gardner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Floyd M. Gardner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Floyd M. Gardner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Floyd M. Gardner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Floyd M. Gardner. Floyd M. Gardner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gardner, Floyd M.. (1998). Demodulator reference recovery techniques suited for digital implementation. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 12–17.57 indexed citations
3.
Gardner, Floyd M. & John D. Baker. (1996). Simulation Techniques: Models of Communication Signals and Processes. Medical Entomology and Zoology.27 indexed citations
Gardner, Floyd M.. (1985). On-board processing for mobile satellite communications. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 88. 21382.9 indexed citations
9.
Gardner, Floyd M.. (1984). Phaselock Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics. SMC-14(1). 170–171.725 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Gardner, Floyd M.. (1983). Multipath link and modem design for satellite mobile communications. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 84. 21793.4 indexed citations
11.
Gardner, Floyd M.. (1978). Clock recovery from a nonlinear channel. 2(2). 159–163.1 indexed citations
12.
Gardner, Floyd M.. (1976). Carrier and clock synchronisation for TDMA digital communications. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 77. 20303.2 indexed citations
13.
Gardner, Floyd M.. (1975). Clock recovery for QPSK-TDMA receivers. International Conference on Communications. 2.3 indexed citations
Gardner, Floyd M.. (1964). Field-effect transistors as dc amplifiers. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
16.
Mallinckrodt, A. John & Floyd M. Gardner. (1963). Distortion in transistor amplifiers. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 10(4). 288–289.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.