Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Time distribution of rainfall in heavy storms
1967528 citationsFloyd A. HuffWater Resources Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Floyd A. Huff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Floyd A. Huff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Floyd A. Huff more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Floyd A. Huff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Floyd A. Huff. The network helps show where Floyd A. Huff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Floyd A. Huff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Floyd A. Huff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Floyd A. Huff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Floyd A. Huff. Floyd A. Huff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Huff, Floyd A.. (2014). Relations between Summer Hailstorms in Illinois and Associated Synoptic Weather. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
2.
Huff, Floyd A., et al.. (2014). Study of Rainout of Radioactivity in Illinois: Second Progress Report. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
3.
Huff, Floyd A., et al.. (2014). Study of Rainout of Radioactivity in Illinois: First Progress Report. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
Changnon, Stanley A., et al.. (1979). Final Report on Operational Seeding Evaluation Techniques. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).1 indexed citations
12.
Huff, Floyd A., et al.. (1978). CHICAGO HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL AREA PROJECT: A COMPREHENSIVE NEW STUDY OF URBAN HYDROMETEOROLOGY.4 indexed citations
13.
Changnon, Stanley A., et al.. (1978). PROGRESS ON CHICAGO HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL AREA PROJECT; A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF URBAN HYDROMETEOROLOGY.1 indexed citations
Huff, Floyd A.. (1971). Distribution of Hourly Precipitation in Illinois. IDEALS (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign).8 indexed citations
17.
Huff, Floyd A., et al.. (1971). Effect of cooling tower effluents on atmospheric conditions in Northeastern Illinois.3 indexed citations
18.
Huff, Floyd A., et al.. (1969). Evaluation of Precipitation Modification Experiments from Precipitation Rate Measurements.3 indexed citations
19.
Huff, Floyd A. & John L. Vogel. (1961). Severe Rainstorms in Illinois. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).3 indexed citations
20.
Huff, Floyd A., et al.. (1955). CORRESPONDENCE. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 36(9). 489–490.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.