Diana Verseghy
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.5%
- Atmospheric Science top 0.5%
- Water Science and Technology top 1%
- Environmental Engineering top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- N. A. McFarlaneMike LazarePaul BartlettT. Andrew BlackMurray D. MacKayMatthew G. LettsNigel T. RouletR. F. Grant
- Topics
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (31 papers)Cryospheric studies and observations (29 papers)Climate change and permafrost (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Diana Verseghy
62 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Global and Planetary Change 2.7k
- Atmospheric Science 2.6k
- Water Science and Technology 1.1k
- Environmental Engineering 695
- Ecology 476
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Verseghy
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Verseghy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Verseghy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Verseghy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Verseghy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Verseghy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Verseghy. The network helps show where Diana Verseghy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Verseghy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Verseghy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Verseghy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Verseghy. Diana Verseghy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 155 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | 251 | |
| 13 | 89 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 251 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 455 | |
| 20 | CLASS-A Canadian land surface scheme for CGMs. II. Vegetation model and coupled runs | 3 |
About Diana Verseghy
Diana Verseghy is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Water Science and Technology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (31 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (29 papers) and Climate change and permafrost (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (2.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.7k citations) and Water Science and Technology (1.1k citations). Diana Verseghy has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include N. A. McFarlane, Mike Lazare, Paul Bartlett, T. Andrew Black, Murray D. MacKay, Matthew G. Letts, Nigel T. Roulet, R. F. Grant, Shusen Wang and E. D. Soulis. Their work appears in journals such as Remote Sensing of Environment, Journal of Climate and Water Resources Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.