Florence Kermen

974 total citations
18 papers, 651 citations indexed

About

Florence Kermen is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Florence Kermen has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 651 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sensory Systems, 13 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Florence Kermen's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (14 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (13 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers). Florence Kermen is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (14 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (13 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (5 papers). Florence Kermen collaborates with scholars based in France, Norway and Belgium. Florence Kermen's co-authors include Nathalie Mandairon, Anne Didier, Emre Yaksi, Sébastien Sultan, Cameron Wyatt, Luis M. Franco, Samuel Garcia, Joëlle Sacquet, Catherine Rouby and Moustafa Bensafi and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Florence Kermen

18 papers receiving 644 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Florence Kermen France 14 382 200 147 113 108 18 651
Heather M. Schellinck Canada 18 409 1.1× 335 1.7× 53 0.4× 47 0.4× 59 0.5× 27 769
Dwayne D. Simmons United States 21 934 2.4× 296 1.5× 50 0.3× 61 0.5× 261 2.4× 48 1.2k
Gordon M. Shepherd United States 8 152 0.4× 473 2.4× 76 0.5× 29 0.3× 44 0.4× 8 1.1k
Olga Escanilla United States 10 475 1.2× 293 1.5× 126 0.9× 118 1.0× 95 0.9× 13 594
Han Chin Wang United States 8 349 0.9× 390 1.9× 33 0.2× 40 0.4× 42 0.4× 9 733
Edward Orona United States 14 386 1.0× 568 2.8× 99 0.7× 54 0.5× 102 0.9× 20 816
Tobias F. Marton United States 8 470 1.2× 574 2.9× 42 0.3× 54 0.5× 12 0.1× 10 996
Amiram Shneiderman United States 13 633 1.7× 317 1.6× 124 0.8× 23 0.2× 220 2.0× 13 891
Jessica H. Brann United States 12 314 0.8× 199 1.0× 81 0.6× 86 0.8× 44 0.4× 14 501
Billy Y. B. Lau United States 13 66 0.2× 272 1.4× 102 0.7× 23 0.2× 59 0.5× 15 735

Countries citing papers authored by Florence Kermen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Florence Kermen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Florence Kermen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florence Kermen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Florence Kermen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Florence Kermen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Florence Kermen. The network helps show where Florence Kermen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Florence Kermen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Florence Kermen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Florence Kermen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Florence Kermen. Florence Kermen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Piarulli, Stefania, et al.. (2023). Effects of gadolinium (Gd) and a Gd-based contrast agent (GBCA) on early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere. 350. 140950–140950. 12 indexed citations
2.
Duvall, Laura B., et al.. (2023). Neurobiology and Changing Ecosystems: Mechanisms Underlying Responses to Human-Generated Environmental Impacts. Journal of Neuroscience. 43(45). 7530–7537. 4 indexed citations
3.
Andreassen, Anna H., et al.. (2022). Brain dysfunction during warming is linked to oxygen limitation in larval zebrafish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(39). e2207052119–e2207052119. 46 indexed citations
4.
Kermen, Florence, et al.. (2021). Odor hedonics coding in the vertebrate olfactory bulb. Cell and Tissue Research. 383(1). 485–493. 5 indexed citations
5.
Kermen, Florence, et al.. (2020). Chronic unpredictable stress induces anxiety-like behaviors in young zebrafish. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 10339–10339. 45 indexed citations
6.
Kermen, Florence, et al.. (2020). Stimulus-specific behavioral responses of zebrafish to a large range of odors exhibit individual variability. BMC Biology. 18(1). 66–66. 31 indexed citations
7.
Kermen, Florence, et al.. (2020). Interhemispheric connections between olfactory bulbs improve odor detection. PLoS Biology. 18(4). e3000701–e3000701. 22 indexed citations
8.
Mandairon, Nathalie, Nicola Kuczewski, Florence Kermen, et al.. (2018). Opposite regulation of inhibition by adult-born granule cells during implicit versus explicit olfactory learning. eLife. 7. 20 indexed citations
9.
Kermen, Florence, Nicola Kuczewski, Jérémy Forest, et al.. (2016). Topographical representation of odor hedonics in the olfactory bulb. Nature Neuroscience. 19(7). 876–878. 32 indexed citations
10.
Vinera, Jennifer, Florence Kermen, Joëlle Sacquet, et al.. (2015). Olfactory perceptual learning requires action of noradrenaline in the olfactory bulb: comparison with olfactory associative learning. Learning & Memory. 22(3). 192–196. 14 indexed citations
11.
Mandairon, Nathalie, Florence Kermen, Caroline J. Charpentier, et al.. (2014). Context-driven activation of odor representations in the absence of olfactory stimuli in the olfactory bulb and piriform cortex. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 8. 138–138. 24 indexed citations
12.
Kermen, Florence, Luis M. Franco, Cameron Wyatt, & Emre Yaksi. (2013). Neural circuits mediating olfactory-driven behavior in fish. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 7. 62–62. 93 indexed citations
13.
Kermen, Florence, et al.. (2011). Physicochemical influence on odor hedonics. Communicative & Integrative Biology. 4(5). 563–565. 16 indexed citations
14.
Kermen, Florence, et al.. (2011). Molecular complexity determines the number of olfactory notes and the pleasantness of smells. Scientific Reports. 1(1). 206–206. 91 indexed citations
15.
Kermen, Florence, Sébastien Sultan, Joëlle Sacquet, Nathalie Mandairon, & Anne Didier. (2010). Consolidation of an Olfactory Memory Trace in the Olfactory Bulb Is Required for Learning-Induced Survival of Adult-Born Neurons and Long-Term Memory. PLoS ONE. 5(8). e12118–e12118. 28 indexed citations
16.
Sultan, Sébastien, et al.. (2010). Learning‐dependent neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb determines long‐term olfactory memory. The FASEB Journal. 24(7). 2355–2363. 122 indexed citations
17.
Mandairon, Nathalie, Sébastien Sultan, Nolwen L. Rey, et al.. (2009). A computer-assisted odorized hole-board for testing olfactory perception in mice. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 180(2). 296–303. 33 indexed citations
18.
Busto, Germain U., Julie E. Elie, Florence Kermen, et al.. (2009). Expression of Zif268 in the granule cell layer of the adult mouse olfactory bulb is modulated by experience. European Journal of Neuroscience. 29(7). 1431–1439. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026