Flip Phillips

1.1k total citations
50 papers, 807 citations indexed

About

Flip Phillips is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Flip Phillips has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 807 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 9 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Flip Phillips's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (29 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers). Flip Phillips is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (29 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (9 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers). Flip Phillips collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Flip Phillips's co-authors include James T. Todd, J. Farley Norman, Gabriel J. Diaz, Brett R. Fajen, Victor Perotti, Astrid M. L. Kappers, Heather E. Ross, David D. Woods, Jan J. Koenderink and Pawan Sinha and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Physics Today.

In The Last Decade

Flip Phillips

48 papers receiving 773 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Flip Phillips United States	17	584	190	160	141	66	50	807
Francene D. Reichel United States	8	479 0.8×	187 1.0×	141 0.9×	49 0.3×	63 1.0×	9	607
Martin Jüttner Germany	11	660 1.1×	131 0.7×	245 1.5×	145 1.0×	68 1.0×	31	954
Daniel J. Weintraub United States	20	661 1.1×	269 1.4×	83 0.5×	123 0.9×	37 0.6×	59	1.0k
Jacqueline M. Fulvio United States	14	352 0.6×	86 0.5×	109 0.7×	59 0.4×	53 0.8×	36	593
Fulvio Domini United States	20	1.0k 1.8×	188 1.0×	291 1.8×	138 1.0×	15 0.2×	92	1.1k
Andrew Glennerster United Kingdom	19	1.0k 1.8×	197 1.0×	297 1.9×	109 0.8×	20 0.3×	54	1.3k
Nao NINOMIYA Japan	6	585 1.0×	91 0.5×	118 0.7×	149 1.1×	17 0.3×	26	824
Edward A. Essock United States	23	795 1.4×	102 0.5×	459 2.9×	113 0.8×	29 0.4×	51	1.6k
Bettina L. Beard United States	11	743 1.3×	223 1.2×	141 0.9×	137 1.0×	42 0.6×	27	1.2k
Laurie M. Wilcox Canada	17	962 1.6×	171 0.9×	331 2.1×	73 0.5×	14 0.2×	123	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Flip Phillips

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flip Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flip Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flip Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flip Phillips

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flip Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flip Phillips. The network helps show where Flip Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Flip Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Flip Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Flip Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Flip Phillips. Flip Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Schmidt, Filipp, et al.. (2024). Perceptual plausibility of exaggerated realistic motion. Cognition. 251. 105880–105880.

Sun, Vincent, et al.. (2024). What the visual system can learn from the non-dominant hand: The effect of graphomotor engagement on visual discrimination. Memory & Cognition. 53(1). 325–340.

Todd, James T., Ying Yu, & Flip Phillips. (2023). Qualitative perception of 3D shape from patterns of luminance curvature. Journal of Vision. 23(5). 10–10. 4 indexed citations

Ye, Jie, Priti Gupta, Tapan Kumar Gandhi, et al.. (2021). Resilience of temporal processing to early and extended visual deprivation. Vision Research. 186. 80–86. 8 indexed citations

Schmidt, Filipp, Flip Phillips, & Roland W. Fleming. (2019). Visual perception of shape-transforming processes: ‘Shape Scission’. Cognition. 189. 167–180. 18 indexed citations

Norman, J. Farley, et al.. (2018). Haptic shape discrimination and interhemispheric communication. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 377–377. 8 indexed citations

Norman, J. Farley, et al.. (2016). Perceiving Object Shape from Specular Highlight Deformation, Boundary Contour Deformation, and Active Haptic Manipulation. PLoS ONE. 11(2). e0149058–e0149058. 8 indexed citations

Phillips, Flip, et al.. (2014). Specularity and shape from line drawings. Journal of Vision. 14(10). 729–729. 1 indexed citations

Todd, James T., et al.. (2012). The role of symmetry in 3D shape discrimination across changes in viewpoint. Journal of Vision. 12(9). 1048–1048. 1 indexed citations

10.

Diaz, Gabriel J., Brett R. Fajen, & Flip Phillips. (2012). Anticipation from biological motion: The goalkeeper problem.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 38(4). 848–864. 65 indexed citations

11.

Norman, J. Farley, et al.. (2012). Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson’s “feelies”. Experimental Brain Research. 222(3). 321–332. 22 indexed citations

12.

Lappin, Joseph S., J. Farley Norman, & Flip Phillips. (2011). Fechner, information, and shape perception. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 73(8). 2353–2378. 18 indexed citations

13.

Diaz, Gabriel J., Flip Phillips, & Brett R. Fajen. (2009). Intercepting moving targets: a little foresight helps a lot. Experimental Brain Research. 195(3). 345–360. 26 indexed citations

14.

Phillips, Flip, et al.. (2009). Distortions of Posterior Visual Space. Perception. 38(7). 1045–1052. 4 indexed citations

15.

Phillips, Flip, et al.. (2009). Perceptual equivalence between vision and touch is complexity dependent. Acta Psychologica. 132(3). 259–266. 25 indexed citations

16.

Norman, J. Farley, et al.. (2009). The perception of 3-D shape from shadows cast onto curved surfaces. Acta Psychologica. 131(1). 1–11. 11 indexed citations

17.

Norman, J. Farley, Flip Phillips, & Heather E. Ross. (2001). Information Concentration along the Boundary Contours of Naturally Shaped Solid Objects. Perception. 30(11). 1285–1294. 54 indexed citations

18.

Tittle, James S., J. Farley Norman, Victor Perotti, & Flip Phillips. (1998). The Perception of Scale-Dependent and Scale-Independent Surface Structure from Binocular Disparity, Texture, and Shading. Perception. 27(2). 147–166. 31 indexed citations

19.

Perotti, Victor, et al.. (1998). The perception of surface curvature from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics. 60(3). 377–388. 53 indexed citations

20.

Norman, J. Farley, James T. Todd, & Flip Phillips. (1995). The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information. Perception & Psychophysics. 57(5). 629–636. 111 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact