Flávio Dantas

697 total citations
30 papers, 380 citations indexed

About

Flávio Dantas is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Flávio Dantas has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 380 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 10 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Flávio Dantas's work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (22 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Flávio Dantas is often cited by papers focused on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (22 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Flávio Dantas collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and United States. Flávio Dantas's co-authors include Hagen Rampes, Peter Fisher, Joyce Frye, Robert T. Mathie, Michel Van Wassenhoven, Jennifer Jacobs, Menachem Oberbaum, Chaturbhuja Nayak, John A. Ives and Raj Kumar Manchanda and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Flávio Dantas

28 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Flávio Dantas Brazil 9 281 58 51 47 43 30 380
Michel Van Wassenhoven Belgium 10 281 1.0× 19 0.3× 42 0.8× 55 1.2× 17 0.4× 31 357
Dean Crothers United States 7 320 1.1× 12 0.2× 42 0.8× 53 1.1× 36 0.8× 8 399
A.L.B. Rutten Netherlands 10 235 0.8× 15 0.3× 60 1.2× 37 0.8× 25 0.6× 17 290
Stefanie Maxion‐Bergemann Germany 8 117 0.4× 40 0.7× 41 0.8× 14 0.3× 23 0.5× 20 460
Subhranil Saha India 8 170 0.6× 41 0.7× 19 0.4× 29 0.6× 26 0.6× 102 316
Munmun Koley India 8 170 0.6× 41 0.7× 20 0.4× 29 0.6× 26 0.6× 96 311
E. Ernst United Kingdom 4 160 0.6× 22 0.4× 66 1.3× 22 0.5× 40 0.9× 4 314
Antony Porcino Canada 9 117 0.4× 55 0.9× 15 0.3× 15 0.3× 42 1.0× 19 288
Byungmook Lim South Korea 11 236 0.8× 45 0.8× 11 0.2× 24 0.5× 55 1.3× 37 460
Chaturbhuja Nayak India 11 259 0.9× 11 0.2× 43 0.8× 30 0.6× 14 0.3× 67 392

Countries citing papers authored by Flávio Dantas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flávio Dantas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flávio Dantas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flávio Dantas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flávio Dantas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flávio Dantas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flávio Dantas. The network helps show where Flávio Dantas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Flávio Dantas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Flávio Dantas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Flávio Dantas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Flávio Dantas. Flávio Dantas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dantas, Flávio. (2024). Responsabilidade social e pós-graduação no Brasil: idéias para (avali)ação. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação. 1(2). 1 indexed citations
2.
Dantas, Flávio, Robert T. Mathie, Joyce Frye, & Chaturbhuja Nayak. (2021). Homeopathy in the treatment of influenza: a data collection proposal. International Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206. 7(23). 56–62. 3 indexed citations
3.
Dantas, Flávio. (2020). Resultados terapêuticos da homeopatia em pacientes suspeitos ou confirmados de COVID-19 no Brasil: Protocolo para estudo observacional prospectivo. 46–46. 2 indexed citations
4.
Dantas, Flávio. (2017). O medicamento homeopático provoca sintomas em voluntários aparentemente sadios? A contribuição brasileira ao debate sobre os ensaios patogenéticos homeopáticos. 80. 183–206.
5.
Dantas, Flávio. (2017). Do homeopathic medicines cause drug-dependent adverse effects or aggravations?. 80. 142–150. 3 indexed citations
6.
Dantas, Flávio. (2017). Do homeopathic medicines induce symptoms in apparently healthy volunteers? The Brazilian contribution to the debate on homeopathic pathogenetic trials. 80. 151–171. 1 indexed citations
7.
Dantas, Flávio, et al.. (2016). ERRATA. Engenharia Agrícola. 36(4). 736–736.
8.
Mathie, Robert T., Michel Van Wassenhoven, Jennifer Jacobs, et al.. (2016). Model validity and risk of bias in randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 25. 120–125. 19 indexed citations
9.
Mathie, Robert T., Michel Van Wassenhoven, Raj Kumar Manchanda, et al.. (2014). Model validity of randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment. Homeopathy. 103(1). 74–74. 3 indexed citations
10.
Mathie, Robert T., Michel Van Wassenhoven, Joyce Frye, et al.. (2012). Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 12(1). 49–49. 46 indexed citations
11.
Dantas, Flávio, et al.. (2008). Ensino da deontologia, ética médica e bioética nas escolas médicas Brasileiras: uma revisão sistemática. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 32(4). 507–517. 37 indexed citations
12.
Dantas, Flávio, et al.. (2007). A systematic review of the quality of homeopathic pathogenetic trials published from 1945 to 1995. Homeopathy. 96(1). 4–16. 39 indexed citations
13.
Dantas, Flávio, et al.. (2007). Authors’ response: we must distinguish symptoms caused by the medicine from other symptoms. Homeopathy. 96(4). 275–276. 1 indexed citations
14.
Dantas, Flávio, et al.. (2002). Atitudes de Estudantes de Medicina sobre Práticas Médicas Heterodoxas no Brasil. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 26(2). 99–104. 5 indexed citations
15.
Fisher, Peter, Flávio Dantas, & Hagen Rampes. (2002). The Safety of Homeopathic Products. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 95(9). 474–475. 4 indexed citations
16.
Fisher, Peter & Flávio Dantas. (2001). Homeopathic pathogenetic trials of Acidum malicum and Acidum ascorbicum. British Homeopathic journal. 90(3). 118–125. 8 indexed citations
17.
Dantas, Flávio & Hagen Rampes. (2000). Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review. British Homeopathic journal. 89(s1). S35–S38. 25 indexed citations
18.
Dantas, Flávio. (1985). DESINFORMAÇÃO E DEFORMAÇÃO NO ENSINO MÉDICO: A HOMEOPATIA NO CONTEXTO DA FARMACOLOGIA MÉDICA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 25–29. 2 indexed citations
19.
Dantas, Flávio, et al.. (1985). O ENSINO DA DEONTOLOGIA NOS CURSOS DE GRADUAÇÃO MÉDICA DO BRASIL. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 7–10. 5 indexed citations
20.
Dantas, Flávio. (1982). Difusao e ensino da homeopatia no Brasil: uma visao estrategica. 29–34. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026