Flávia L. Osório
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Genetics
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Diogo Araújo DeSousaGiovanni Abrahão SalumGisele Gus ManfroSílvia Helena KollerJosé A. CrippaJosé Alexandre S. CrippaRafael G. dos SantosMariana Fortunata Donadon
- Topics
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric ResearchHarvard Review of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- BrazilSouth SudanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Flávia L. Osório
8 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Clinical Psychology 167
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 55
- General Health Professions 53
- Genetics 48
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 47
Countries citing papers authored by Flávia L. Osório
This map shows the geographic impact of Flávia L. Osório's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flávia L. Osório with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flávia L. Osório more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Flávia L. Osório
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flávia L. Osório. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flávia L. Osório. The network helps show where Flávia L. Osório may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Flávia L. Osório
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Flávia L. Osório. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Flávia L. Osório based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Flávia L. Osório. Flávia L. Osório is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 63 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 132 |
About Flávia L. Osório
Flávia L. Osório is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 8 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers) and Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (167 citations), Occupational Therapy (26 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations). Flávia L. Osório has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, South Sudan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Diogo Araújo DeSousa, Giovanni Abrahão Salum, Gisele Gus Manfro, Sílvia Helena Koller, José A. Crippa, José Alexandre S. Crippa, Rafael G. dos Santos, Mariana Fortunata Donadon, Rafael Faria Sanches and Marcos Hortes Nisihara Chagas. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research and Harvard Review of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.