Fiona McHardy
About
In The Last Decade
Fiona McHardy
6 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 396
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 268
- Surgery 174
- Physiology 95
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 77
Countries citing papers authored by Fiona McHardy
This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona McHardy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona McHardy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona McHardy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona McHardy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona McHardy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona McHardy. The network helps show where Fiona McHardy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fiona McHardy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fiona McHardy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fiona McHardy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fiona McHardy. Fiona McHardy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | |
| 2 | 50 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 345 | |
| 6 | 34 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.